• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / You Are What You Measure: Take Charge of Your Individual Surgeon Metric Data or Someone Else Will

You Are What You Measure: Take Charge of Your Individual Surgeon Metric Data or Someone Else Will

Kevin R Kasten, MD1, Konstantinos Spaniolas, MD2. 1Carolinas HealthCare System, 2Stony Brook Medical Center

Introduction: The last decade yielded myriad studies of surgical outcomes using large datasets. Unfortunately, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality System (TMMS) datasets were developed with institutional outcomes in mind. In an attempt to quantify individual surgeon quality, these platforms are increasingly queried but with minimal supporting data. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Surgeon Specific Registry (SSR) is an online database whereby surgeons conveniently track cases and outcomes for maintenance of certification (MOC). Here, we identify potential shortcomings of outcome measurement using this reporting system and identify methods to overcome them using commercially available statistical software.

Methods and Procedures: One surgeon (KRK) maintained 100% case capture within ACS SSR from July 2014 through August 2016. Additional variable fields were generated within SPSS including “referring physician”, “insurance status”, “BMI” and others. Variables were recoded as necessary for statistical analysis. CPT codes were grouped into procedure bundles (i.e. “lap_right_colectomy”) for outcome measurement. As a project goal was ease of use, a single coding script was generated and run on a monthly basis after the online SSR database was exported into the SPSS database (Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Pre-defined reports were run using ACS SSR and compared to SPSS analysis.

Results: The study dataset included 536 cases completed at a tertiary referral center. The SSR “Outcomes by Frequency” report was identical to SPSS frequency reporting for “death”, “return to operating room” and “readmission to hospital” variables. The SSR “Wound Infection Report” only reported “Superficial Incisional SSI”, ignoring organ and deep space infections. Predefined SSR reports were unable to analyze anything. To attempt analysis, the user must run the “Post-Op Occurrence by CPT Code” report, find each complication occurrence and click through to the associated patient record. This proves inadequate without methods for statistical analysis. Further, grouping by “emergency” field or comorbidity is not possible, precluding ability for risk-adjustment. In contrast, SPSS provides all necessary functionality for effective analysis of outcomes. On average, 1 hour a month was required to import data into SPSS, update values for user-defined variables, run the previously-defined script, and evaluate outcomes.

Conclusions: Minimal data supports use of non-100% capture data for individual surgeon outcomes. Data entry by non-surgeons may lead to misidentification of outcomes or risk-adjustment variables. Using the ACS SSR with a commercially available statistical package enables surgeons to control their data and effectively demonstrate outcomes.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 79241

Program Number: P654

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

85

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals