• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Women\’s Attitudes on Transvaginal Surgery

Women\’s Attitudes on Transvaginal Surgery

Yueyang Fei, Mario Salazar, MD, Jeffrey W Hazey, MD

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Background
Past studies comparing transvaginal NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) to laparoscopic surgery have produced a wide variety of conflicting results. Varying results have been presented from those that demonstrated a preference for or positive perception of TVC to those which found a negative perception of and aversion to TVC as a surgical option. In light of the disparity in results, our study aimed to identify demographic data as well as clinical factors (risks, outcomes, etc.) that significantly affected women’s opinions. Once specific considerations are identified as important in the decision-making process regarding NOTES, further studies may better investigate and assess how these factors help formulate women’s perceptions.

Methods
142 Female patients presenting to General and GI surgery clinics for consultation were surveyed. After explanation and discussion of both laparoscopic cholecystectomy and TVC, patients answered a 10 question survey regarding the degree of importance they placed on common general surgery as well as TVC outcomes and complications. They were also queried as to their degree of concern over training and possible advantages of TVC in particular as well as possible preference for TVC over LSC. Demographic, social, and medical history data were collected on all patients who participated. χ2 analysis was performed to test for association between women’s concerns and their preference for transvaginal NOTES over the standard laparoscopic surgery.

Results
Overall, a small majority of respondents (55%) would choose TVC over LSC. For women who would choose TVC over LSC, a potentially shortened recovery time and improved post-surgical cosmesis were found to be the most significant factors affecting their decision. Despite concerns over common complications such as infection and post-surgical pain (around 70% rated each a significant concern), neither appeared to influence a patient’s preference for TVC or LSC. Age was the only statistically significant demographic factor that affected women’s preferences. 35% of women younger than age 36 would choose transvaginal NOTES whereas 63% and 61% of women ages 36-55 and older than age 55, respectively, would prefer the transvaginal technique. No other demographic data appeared to be significant in patient’s choice of procedures.

Conclusions
Our study further adds support to the idea that cosmesis and age are critical factors in women considering TVC over LSC. As such, we believe there is further need for research into these two factors and why they have or have not translated into increased number of TVC procedures being done. In addition, if age and cosmesis are important does it follow that geography and cultural factors also play a role? Finally, despite an overall positive response and even preference for TVC in most studies including ours, TVC has been slow to become a standard procedure or option. As such, future studies will need to move away from questions regarding perceived risks and delve into more personal, and possibly more important, social and cultural factors which complicate the issue of perception. If we do not, then the disconnect between the slow adoption of TVC despite its positive perceptions cannot be understood.


Session: Poster Presentation

Program Number: P582

84

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals