• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Has an Impact on Survival in Node-negative Esophageal Cancer

The Total Number of Resected Lymph Nodes Has an Impact on Survival in Node-negative Esophageal Cancer

Introduction: While the identification of lymph node metastases is prognostic, there is considerable controversy regarding the extent of lymph node resection in the surgical management of esophageal cancer. In this single-institution study, we examine the significance of total number of lymph node counts on survival in patients with lymph node negative esophageal carcinoma (American Joint Committee On Cancer TNM stage I-IIA).

Methods: From May 1991 and April 2009, a total of99 patients with lymph node negative esophagealcancer (38 squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], 56 adenocarcinomas [AC], 5 other types)underwent a standardized surgical resection involving esophagectomy with a mediastinal adventitial resection and lymph node dissection were identified from a propectively maintained electronic database at our institution. The patients were classified into 3 groups according the number of lymph nodes resected during surgery (1-10, 11-17, >17 lymph nodes). Overall patient survival, defined as the date of esophagectomy to the date of death, was compared among these lymph node groups by using the Kaplan Meir method with Log Rank test. Cox regression analyses wereperformed to evaluate the association between survival and the number of negative lymph nodes after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: The median follow-up time was 32 months. There were 26 (26.3%), 33 (33.3%) and 40 (40.4%) patients with 1-10, 11-17 and >17 lymph nodes resected respectively. The overall median survival for the whole cohort of patients was 5.7 years with 3-year and 5-year actuarial survival rate being 78% and 66% respectively.

Upon univariate analysis, the number of lymph nodes (P value < 0.001) as well as T classification (P value = 0.01) were the only significant prognostic factors for overall patient survival. The median and actuarial 5- year survival for patients with 1-10, 11-17 and >17 resected lymph nodes were 3.6 years and 41%, 5.8 years and 69% and 7.1 years and 76% respectively.

Upon multivariate analysis, the number of resected negative lymph nodes was independently associated with better survival after adjusting for potential confounders including sex, age, histological type, histological differentiation, T classification, lymphovascular invasions, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. There was reduced hazard of death with increasing number of examined lymph nodes. Compared to patients with 1-10 lymph nodes, the death hazard was decreased by 51% and 79% in patients with 11-17(HR: 0.49, CI:0.25-0.96, P value =0.001) and >17 (HR: 0.21, CI 0.09-0.05, P Value=0.001)lymph nodes respectively.

Conclusions: The current studydemonstrates that a greater number of negative lymph nodes removed during esophagectomy is associated with improved overall patient survival. Data from current study suggest that at least 18 lymph nodes should be removed in patients undergoing surgical resection for esophageal cancer


Session: Poster

Program Number: P340

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search