• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / THE IMPACT OF SIMULATION TRAINING FOR RESIDENTS PARTICIPATING IN ROBOTIC SURGERY

THE IMPACT OF SIMULATION TRAINING FOR RESIDENTS PARTICIPATING IN ROBOTIC SURGERY

Michael L Williford, MD1, Paula D Strassle, MSPH2, Meredith C Duke, MD, MBA1. 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Surgery, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Epidemiology

Introduction: The primary aim of this study was to determine how three types of simulation impacted resident comfort level with various aspects of robotic surgery. As robotic surgery increases in prevalence, it is necessary for residents to become facile with this technology during training.

Methods and Procedures: Surgery residents at a single institution were surveyed in September 2017. They were asked to answer demographic questions and rate their comfort level (0=not comfortable, 10=very comfortable) with aspects of robotic surgery. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests were used to assess whether there were changes in comfort level before and after labs, and Chi-square goodness of fit tests were used to assess whether dry lab (using inanimate objects), wet lab (using a porcine model), or simulator modules were thought to be most helpful in obtaining specific robotic skills.

Results: The survey response rate was 73% (n=32). Ninety-one percent of residents felt that robotic surgery is not intuitive. Prior to simulation, 94% of residents felt inadequately prepared to safely operate on the robotic console. Following simulation, 100% felt better prepared and more confident to participate in robotic surgery.

Among residents that participated in a dry lab (n=25), on average residents reported a 3.8 point increase in comfort docking the robot (p<0.0001) and a 2.9 point increase in comfort being bedside assistant after the lab (p<0.0001). Among those who participated in a wet lab (n=20), on average a 2.3 point increase was seen in comfort docking the robot (p=0.0003), a 1.7 point increase was seen in comfort being bedside assistant (p=0.003), and a 2.2 point increase was seen in comfort operating on the console after the lab (p<0.0001). No significant difference in console comfort was seen across PGY level, and no differences in skill improvement were seen across gender.

While residents did not report a preference for simulation type in learning how to adjust the camera (p=0.15) or handle robotic instruments (p=0.61), they reported that simulator modules were most helpful for learning electrocautery (p=0.009) and that the wet lab was most helpful for learning both suturing (p=0.002) and stapling (p=0.002).

Conclusions: In order to be functional at the bedside and safely operate on the console, residents should have the ability to practice skills in a simulated environment. All 3 types of simulation studied had a positive impact on resident comfort and skill acquisition. Therefore, simulation should be considered an integral part of resident education.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86536

Program Number: P798

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

47

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals