• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Impact of Gastric Tip Necrosis on Clinical Outcomes Following Esophagectomy.

The Impact of Gastric Tip Necrosis on Clinical Outcomes Following Esophagectomy.

Introduction
Anastomotic complications are frequently encountered in the setting of esophagectomy, with leak rates ranging from 10-20%. Complete necrosis of the gastric tip is a rare complication that can be associated with significant morbidity and impairment of quality of life. In the current study, we evaluated the perioperative outcomes of patients who developed gastric tip necrosis following esophagectomy to review contemporary management strategies and to elucidate the impact of this complication on length of stay, morbidity and mortality.

Methods and Procedures
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of 823 esophagectomies performed at the University of Pittsburgh from 2001-2008. Patients with confirmed anastomotic leaks (radiographic or clinical) were identified. Gastric tip necrosis was defined as devitalization of greater than 50% of the esophagogastric anastomosis, with obvious necrosis of at least 1 cm of gastric tissue distal to the anastomosis. Primary endpoints included surgical management strategy, length of stay, complications and mortality. Statistical comparisons were performed with the t-test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results
Gastric tip necrosis was encountered in 14 (1.7%) patients. Median age was 65 (35-80). Only 2/14 (14.3%) patients received neo-adjuvant therapy. Operative approaches included transhiatal (n=6), totally minimally invasive (n=6) and retrosternal (n=2). Among those patients with anastomotic leaks, gastric tip necrosis occurred much more commonly with neck anastomoses (n=13, 2.7%) compared with those in the chest (n=1, 0.3%; p=0.032) [Table]. Eleven patients underwent operative intervention (anastomotic takedown in 5; wide drainage ± flap in 6). The remaining three patients were treated with opening of the wound, packing, antibiotics and TPN or enteral feeds. Associated morbidity was encountered in 8 (57.1%) of patients. There was one death (7.1%). Gastric tip necrosis was associated with longer length of stay compared to those with a leak only (median: 38 vs. 19 days, p=0.17). The majority of patients (71.4%) were discharged with a drain. Strictures were common (n=10, 71.4%) following reconstruction or healing (median number of dilations=3; range: 0-26).

Conclusions
Gastric tip necrosis occurs most commonly in the neck, likely secondary to greater gastric wall tension and an attenuated blood supply relative to intrathoracic anastomoses. It is a highly morbid complication associated with a prolonged hospital course. Quality of life is impacted adversely by the need for long-term drains and repeated dilations. Delay in instituting adjuvant therapy may further compromise outcomes. Aggressive surgical intervention to resect devitalized tissue and establish wide drainage remains the hallmark of care, and will salvage the significant majority of patients.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P361

View Poster

562

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals