• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Fear of Transgastric Cholecystectomy: Misinterpretation of the Biliary Anatomy

The Fear of Transgastric Cholecystectomy: Misinterpretation of the Biliary Anatomy

Introduction:
The prevention of major injury at cholecystectomy relies on the accurate dissection of the cystic duct and artery, and avoidance of major biliary and vascular structures.
The advent of NOTES cholecystectomy has led to a new look and insights into biliary anatomy especially of the Calot’s triangle. Here we show the clinical case of a NOTES transgastric cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis, in which misinterpretation of biliary anatomy occurred.
Methods and procedure:
After induction of pneumoperitoneum using a Veress needle, a single 5mm transparietal port was introduced at the umbilicus to ascertain the feasibility of transgastric cholecystectomy ensure safe gastrotomy creation and closure, insufflation and monitoring of the pneumoperitoneum and to allow the use of a 5mm laparoscopic clip applier. Transgastric access was obtained using a double channel endoscope (KARL STORZ® Endoskope, Germany) under laparoscopic visual control. An endoscopic needle-knife was used to create a full thickness puncture on the anterior wall in the mid-body of the stomach expanded using a 18mm balloon dilator to allow passage of the 12mm gastroscope. The laparoscopic optic could then be switched to a 5mm laparoscopic grasper to expose the gallbladder. Dissection started using the endoscopic flexible tools at the junction between the infundibulum and what was thought to be the cystic duct. During the dissection the size and the orientation of the cystic duct appeared unclear. Decision was made to switch to a laparoscopic view to re-orient the dissection and define the correct planes. At this point we realized that the dissection of the triangle of Calot although started in close proximity to the gallbladder, was far to low and that we had mistaken the common bile duct with the cystic duct. Fortunately the dissection maneuvers had been performed with extreme care and no injury to the CBD occurred. Once the biliary anatomy was clarified the vision was switched back to the endoscope but a 2mm grasper was introduced to improve retraction. Cholecystectomy was performed in a standard fashion. A laparoscopic hook was used to skeletonized, the cystic duct and artery that were clipped using a laparoscopic clip applicator. At the end of the dissection, the operative site was checked to ensure haemostasis and biliostasis. The gallbladder was extracted through the gastrotomy under laparoscopic control and the gastrotomy closed with extracorporeal stitches by means of a 2mm laparoscope and a 3mm needle holder inserted side by side into the 5mm umbilical port.
Conclusions:
Specific anatomical distortions due to the NOTES technique, along lack of exposure,with the present methods of retraction tend to distort the Calot’s triangle by actually flattening it rather than opening it out. Their contribution in producing injury and a preventive strategy based need to be investigated . At this stage whenever the anatomy of the biliary tract is confusing as happened in this case, a temporary “conversion” to a laparoscopic view, more familiar to the surgeon’s eye and therefore clearer that will provide a better understanding of the location of the common bile duct in respect to the cystic duct.


Session: Podium Video Presentation

Program Number: V026

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search