• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Single Site Laparoscopic (ssl) Cholecystectomy in Human Cadavers Using Novel Percutaneous Retraction and a Magnetic Anchoring and Guidance System (mags): Re-establishing the Critical View

Single Site Laparoscopic (ssl) Cholecystectomy in Human Cadavers Using Novel Percutaneous Retraction and a Magnetic Anchoring and Guidance System (mags): Re-establishing the Critical View

Introduction: SSL, though promising, introduces ergonomic challenges due to loss of instrument triangulation as obtained in conventional laparoscopy. This limitation makes establishing the critical view during dissection of the Triangle of Calot (TOC) difficult and has resulted in a variety of strategies to overcome the problem. This study investigates use of a novel percutaneous grasper that mimics a standard laparoscopic instrument and MAGS in aiding surgeons to perform SSL cholecystectomy more easily and with a technique that closely mimics four-port cholecystectomy.

Methods: SSL cholecystectomy was performed on four female cadavers by an expert laparoscopic surgeon with limited experience in SSL. A 15–18mm incision was made at the umbilicus and the MAGS introduced into the abdomen. MAGS consists of an oblong (7.8cm × 14mm) magnetic internal effector with a retractable monopolar cautery hook (6.3cm) and is coupled across the abdominal wall to an external hand-held magnet. By sliding the external magnet over the abdominal wall and applying external pressure, subtle motions of the hook can be achieved. Following MAGS introduction, a commercially available port comprised of a foam cuff and three 5mm trocars was placed. Next, the novel grasper was introduced percutaneously in the RUQ. The device’s 3mm transabdominal shaft is mated to a 5mm end effector intra-corporeally and can grasp tissue with the purchase and security of a standard laparoscopic instrument while providing 360° rotation and locking jaws. Retraction was accomplished using the percutaneous grasper to manipulate the fundus and a standard 5mm grasper through the umbilical port for the infundibulum. Dissection was done using a combination of the MAGS and a standard Maryland dissector. Total procedure time, time from procedure start to obtain a critical view of the TOC and clipping and dividing the cystic duct/ artery, time for dissection of the gall bladder from the liver bed, and thickness of the abdominal wall at the umbilicus were measured. A multi-institutional survey was also administered among surgeons having experience with these devices to gauge satisfaction.

Results: The critical view was obtained in each case and all 4 procedures were completed successfully. Both devices performed optimally to allow smooth flow of the procedure. Mean procedure time was 40min (33-51min); time from procedure start to obtaining the critical view and clipping and dividing the cystic duct/ artery was 33 min (28-38min) and time for dissection of the gall bladder from the liver bed was 6.7min (3-13min). The mean abdominal wall thickness was 1.9cm (1.5-2cm). The survey found that MAGS increased surgeon satisfaction in performing SSL cholecystectomy by 73% (18% satisfaction standard SSL, 100% MAGS).

Conclusions: The use of a novel graspers and MAGS overcomes the limitations of SSL cholecystectomy and improves surgeon dexterity. Making SSL feel more like traditional laparoscopy will enable a wider adoption of this procedure in the community.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S071

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search