• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Significantly Reduces Gender Differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery Performance Exam

Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Significantly Reduces Gender Differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery Performance Exam

E. Matthew Ritter, MD1, Matthew Lineberry, PhD2, Daniel A Hashimoto, MD, MS3, Denise Gee, MD3, Angela A Guzzetta, MD4, Walter B Kucera, MD1, Matthew D Nealeigh, DO1, Daniel J Scott, MD4. 1Uniformed Services University/Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 2University of Kansas Medical Center, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, 4University of Texas Southwestern

Background: Psychometric analysis of the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) performance exam showed discernibly higher scores for males than females.  Psychological research has explored gender differences in visuospatial performance, finding that differences, when present, can be reduced with task-specific practice.  We sought to assess the effect of simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curricula on FES performance exam differences by gender.

Methods: Forty-four surgical trainees (25 men (m), 19 women (w)) from three institutions were assessed for baseline endoscopic skill with the FES performance exam.  Forty-seven (29 m, 18 w) then completed a SBML curriculum and were assessed by FES.  Fourteen trained on the GI Mentor 2 (GIM), 18 on the Endoscopy Training System (ETS), and 15 using the simulators described in the Surgical Training for Endoscopic Proficiency (STEP) curriculum.  For the ETS and STEP groups the same group of subjects performed pre- and post-training assessments.  For the GIM group, the pre-training group represented a historical control.  Performance of male and female trainees was compared.

Results: On the pre-training assessment, there were large differences between genders in FES pass rates (m 77%, w 15%, p<0.001) and total scores (m 69 +/-11, w 50 +/-12; p< 0.001). Differences were also present in four of the five FES sub-task scores (Navigation, m 73 +/- 19, w 55 +/- 22, p= 0.02; Loop reduction, m 34 +/- 29, w 14 +/- 22, p= 0.02; Retroflexion, m 81 +/- 17, w 47 +/-27, p< 0.001; Targeting, m 89 +/- 10, w 66 +/- 23, p= 0.002) despite similar median PGY levels and endoscopic experience. No such differences were discernible post-training (Pass rate, m 100%, w 94%, p= 0.4; Total score, m 77 +/- 8, w 72 +/- 12, p= 0.2; Navigation, m 91 +/- 13, w 80 +/- 13, p= 0.009; Loop reduction, m 49 +/- 26, w 46 +/- 36, p= 0.7; Retroflexion, m 82 +/- 18, w 81 +/- 15, p= 0.9; Targeting, m 92 +/- 15, w 86 +/- 12, p= 0.12). Time needed to complete curricula was also not discernably different by gender (m 3.8 +/- 1.7 hours, w 5.0 +/- 2.6 hours, p= 0.17).

Conclusions: Gender-based differences on the FES performance exam are nearly eliminated through task-specific SBML training, consistent with previous findings in psychology about such visuospatial differences.  These findings lend further evidence to the validity argument for the FES performance exam as a measure of basic endoscopic skills.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88413

Program Number: S086

Presentation Session: MIS Education Session

Presentation Type: Podium

43

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals