• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / ROBOTIC VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR GALLBLADDER CANCER AT A HIGH-VOLUME MINIMALLY INVASIVE CENTER

ROBOTIC VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR GALLBLADDER CANCER AT A HIGH-VOLUME MINIMALLY INVASIVE CENTER

Ryan C Pickens, MD1, Jesse K Sulzer, MD, PhD1, Erin E Isenberg, BSPH2, Keith J Murphy, MSPH3, Lee Ocuin, MD1, Erin Baker, MD1, John B Martinie, MD, FACS1, David A Iannitti, MD, FACS1, Dionisios Vrochides, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCSC1. 1Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes Science, Atrium Health

Introduction: This study aims to demonstrate that robotic-assisted radical cholecystectomy is safe and effective. Minimally-invasive radical cholecystectomy has gradually gained approval as a safe and oncologically acceptable modality in the treatment of resectable gallbladder cancer. While robotic-assisted hepatopancreatobiliary surgery has been increasingly described with comparable results to laparoscopic approaches such as for primary liver and pancreatic tail malignancies, current literature for resection of gallbladder cancer has almost exclusively reported laparoscopic experience. We present a comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic radical cholecystectomies at a high-volume center.

Methods and Procedures: A retrospective review was performed on all cases of robotic radical cholecystectomy (RRC) and laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy (LRC) at our institution from January 2013 to August 2018. Patients undergoing either radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer detected preoperatively (cholecystectomy with 4b/5 hepatectomy and portal lymphadenectomy) or a completion operation for malignancy identified after routine cholecystectomy (4b/5 hepatectomy, cystic duct resection, and/or portal lymphadenectomy only) were both included. Any case converted to open was excluded from comparison. Operative details, tumor pathology, clinical and oncologic outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy for resectable gallbladder cancer (20 robotic, 7 laparoscopic). Fifteen patients (55.5%) underwent a completion operation for cancer detected after cholecystectomy. No conversions to open occurred in the robotic cohort, however 1 patient was converted from laparoscopic to open due to safety concerns during adhesiolysis. Three patients in the RRC (15%) did not undergo hepatic resection as the original tumor was on the gallbladder free edge and no residual tumor was identified on ultrasound. Median age, ASA score, estimated blood loss, and operative time were similar between groups. R0 resection was achieved in 66.7% of laparoscopic cases (4/6) and 83.3% of robotic cases (15/18). Median lymph node harvest was greater for the RRC (p=0.043). Postoperative outcomes for median 30-day Clavien 3+ complications, readmissions, and postoperative length of stay as well as final pathology for local invasion, nodal and metastatic spread were similar between cohorts. During a mean follow-up of 21 months (SD 27.18), 6 patients in the RRC (30%) and 2 patients in the LRC (33.3%) developed recurrence.

Conclusions: At a high volume minimally invasive center, robotic-assisted radical cholecystectomy is safe with comparable oncologic benefit when a minimally-invasive approach is possible for select patients. Increased utilization of minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder cancer may demonstrate additional technical benefits of robotic-assistance compared to laparoscopy for patients previously only offered open resection.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95273

Program Number: P667

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

158

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals