• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / ROBOTIC ESOPHAGECTOMY: TRENDS AND PERI-OPERATIVE OUTCOMES: A NATIONAL INPATIENT SAMPLE ASSESSMENT

ROBOTIC ESOPHAGECTOMY: TRENDS AND PERI-OPERATIVE OUTCOMES: A NATIONAL INPATIENT SAMPLE ASSESSMENT

Mark J Dudash, MD1, Ryan Erwin, BA2, James Dove, BA1, Marie Hunsinger, RN, BSHS1, Mohsen Shabahang, MD, PhD1, Anthony Petrick, MD1, Tania K Arora, MD1, Joseph A Blansfield, MD1. 1Geisinger Medical Center, 2Temple University School of Medicine

INTRODUCTION: Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer. Whereas open approaches have the potential for high postoperative complications, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been touted to lower postoperative morbidities. MIE includes both robotic and laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study is to identify trends in MIE and compare outcomes between open, robotic and laparoscopic esophagectomy.

METHODS: Patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2008-2015 entered in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patients were divided into open, laparoscopic and robotic groups for comparison.

RESULTS: A total of 6,415 patients were identified, 248 (3.9%) underwent robotic, 334 (5.2%) underwent laparoscopic, and 5,833 (90.9%) underwent open esophagectomy. MIE rose from 3% in 2008 to 12% of all esophagectomies in 2013. MIE rates remained steady from 2013-2015. Robotic MIE increased steadily from 2008-2015. In 2008, essentially all MIE were performed laparoscopically compared to 2013 when the rates were even. From 2013 to 2015, more MIE was performed robotically than laparoscopically. 

Demographics between the groups were comparable for age, race, and sex. The mean age for the study group was 62 years. Most of the patients were men (80%). The majority of cases were performed at large hospitals (79%), compared to 8% performed at small hospitals and 13% performed at medium sized hospitals. Urban teaching hospitals accounted for 87.5% of the esophagectomies performed in the study.    

Overall complications were lowest for robotic esophagectomy compared to laparoscopic and open (27% vs. 38% vs. 35% respectively, p=0.012). Both pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications were lowest in the robotic cohort. Robotic esophagectomy was also found to have the shortest length of stay (LOS) (9 days vs. 10 (lap) and 11 (open)*, p=<0.0001). Robotic esophagectomy also had the lowest median total charges for the three modalities: $122,926 versus $128,943 for open and $156,676 for laparoscopic (p=0.0002). Mortality for robotic and laparoscopic esophagectomy was comparable and lower than open esophagectomy (1.5% versus 3.9%, p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS: In recent years rates of MIE have been increasing, with robotic esophagectomy comprising the majority of MIE in 2015. With lower LOS, lower overall complications, lower cost, and mortality, robotic esophagectomy is a safe alternative to laparoscopic and open approaches. Studies will be needed to further evaluate robotic MIE in the future.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95538

Program Number: S064

Presentation Session: Residents and Fellows Session

Presentation Type: ResFel

69

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals