• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Descriptions and Video Updates
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • COVID-19 Announcements
    • SAGES 2021 Meeting Information
    • 2021 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
    • 2021 The Next Big Thing (Formerly Emerging Technology) Call For Abstracts
    • 2018 Prevent BDI Consensus Conference
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • Leadership Development and Health Policy Conference Videos
      • SAGES Quality Summit Meeting
      • SAGES 2019
      • SAGES 2018
      • SAGES 2017
      • SAGES 2016
      • SAGES 2015
      • SAGES 2014
      • SAGES 2013
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Membership
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Virtual Hernia Clinic
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • The Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • The SAGES HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Endorsed Courses
    • SAGES Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Educational Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES Quality Initiative
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • SAGES Endorsed Courses
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
    • Fellowship Certification
  • Search
    • COVID-19 Announcements
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Blog
    • All Blog Posts
    • COVID-19
    • Notes from the Battlefield
    • A (Positive) Way Forward
    • President Posts
  • Log In

ROBOTIC-ASSISTED VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A COMPREHENSIVE COST ANALYSIS

Walaa F Abdelmoaty, MD, MBA1, Chris Neighorn, MBA1, Christy M Dunst, MD, FACS2, Lee L Swanstrom, MD, FACS2, Chet W Hammill, MD, MCR, FACS3. 1Providence Portland Medical Center, 2The Oregon Clinic, 3Washington University General Surgery

Introduction: The cost of introducing new surgical technologies plays an important role in their adoption. Technology with higher cost, compared to established solutions, should be justified by better outcomes or other measurable benefits. In inguinal hernia repair, the clinical benefit of robotic-assisted repair, compared to laparoscopic repair, is still debatable. Our group performed a comprehensive cost comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in a large healthcare system in the Western United States.

Methods and procedures: Electronic health records in 32 hospitals were queried for procedural costs of inguinal hernia repairs done between January-2015 and March-2017. Only robotic-assisted or laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs were included. Cost calculations were done using a micro-costing methodology, a utilization based costing model. Device and maintenance costs, included in the fixed cost, were calculated to be $172 per laparoscopic case and $1272 per robotic-assisted case.  These costs were derived from the purchase price, annual maintenance fees, life expectancy, and mean number of operations per year for both robotic and laparoscopic equipment. Total cost included fixed and variable costs. Other outcome measures were length of stay (LOS), conversion to open, and operative times (in-out, cut-to-close, and time in the recovery room). Statistical analysis was done using t-test for continuous variables and X2 test for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The study was exempted from IRB approval due to the de-identified administrative nature of the data.

Results: A total of 2,405 cases; 734 robotic-assisted (633 Primary:101 recurrent) and 1671 laparoscopic (1471 Primary:200 recurrent), were included. The average total cost was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the robotic-assisted group ($5,517) compared to the laparoscopic group ($3,269). However, the average laparoscopic variable cost ($1,105) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than the robotic-assisted cost ($933). Whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups for LOS and conversion to open, average operative times were significantly higher in the robotic-assisted group (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis for primary and recurrent inguinal hernias matched the overall results.

Conclusions: Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair is associated with a significantly higher cost and significantly longer operative times, compared to the laparoscopic approach. The study has shown that only fixed cost contributes to the cost difference between the two approaches. Initial acquisition and maintenance costs plus the longer operative times are the main factors leading to the cost difference. Laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair is more cost-effective compared to a robotic-assisted approach.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87566

Program Number: S002

Presentation Session: Hernia Session

Presentation Type: Podium

Post Views: 38

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2018 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Free SAGES Webinar: Lessons from COVID on Living and Thriving as Surgeons

SAGES recognizes that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a big impact on surgical practice and in surgeon wellness. SAGES’ Reimagining the Practice of Surgery Taskforce will present “Finding the Opportunities: Lessons from COVID and How We Live and Thrive as Surgeons”  to look at ways in which innovative leadership at various levels may help transform […]

Daniel Herron, MD

An opportunity to slow down and appreciate the small joys in life

Dan Herron, MD shares insights with Dana Telem, MD on lessons learned from COVID-19 Fear, anxiety and uncertainty has dominated the first half of 2020. Never before have we, as healthcare providers, been asked to do so much with so little—whether it’s resources like personal protective equipment, dusting off skills related to critical care, or […]

covid testing stock

Notes from the Battlefield – May 14, 2020

Coronavirus Global Surgical Collaborative (CVGSC)* An initiative sponsored by SAGES in collaboration with EAES, AEC, KSELS, and ELSA A group of surgical leaders from affected countries have joined to discuss what they are learning during this Covid-19 Global crisis. The following is a brief summary of what they feel may be useful information to disseminate to the surgical […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Newsletter Subscription

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Important Links

SAGES 2020 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

[footer_backtotop] · Log in

Copyright © 2021 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons · Legal
· Managed by BSC Management, Inc