• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Review of Rygb Versus Fundoplication for Gerd in Obese Patients

Review of Rygb Versus Fundoplication for Gerd in Obese Patients

Introduction: Studies evaluating the effectiveness of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF) in morbidly obese patients have yielded mixed results. Many authors now advocat Laparoscopic RYGB as the surgical treatment of choice for morbidly obese patients with GERD as it has the advantage of treating the GERD as well as the common obesity-related comorbid conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare the GERD-related outcomes of morbidly obese patients treated with LRYGB versus LNF.

Methods: Morbidly obese patients with GERD who underwent either LNF or LRYGB between Nov 2001 and Jul 2009 were analyzed by retrospective review of medical records. GERD-related symptoms included heartburn, regurgitation, waterbrash, dysphagia, globus, bloating, epigastric pain, sinusitis, and respiratory symptoms. Reflux symptoms and antacid use was calulated preop and at 3 month and 12 month follow up. A symptom score was calculated – the lower the score, the less symptoms. Postoperative complications were categorized as mortality, major, and minor. The symptom scores, trends in antacid use, and complications were then compared.

Results: A total of 102 morbidly obese patients with GERD underwent LRYGB while 56 underwent LNF. Both GERD symptoms and antacid usage decreased significantly at 3 month and 12 month follow up in the LRYGB group (Table I).

LRYGB patients with GERD

Table I Preop(n=102) 3 month (n=92) 12 month (n=46) p value preop vs 12 month
Symptom score 2.08 0.28 0.22 <0.0001
On Antacid (% of total group) 95.10 66.30 39.13 <0.0001

Table II LNF LRYGB with GERD P value
Symptom score (preop) 3.75 (n=56) 2.08 (n=102) p<0.0001
Symptom score (12 months) 0.82(n=56) 0.22 (n=46) p<0.0001
On Antacid (preop % of total) 94.64 (n=56) 95.10 (n=102) p= 0.94
On Antacid (12 month % of total) 7.14 (n=56) 39.13 (n=46) p=0.0013

When compared with a group of 56 morbidly obese patients undergoing LNF, the LRYGB patients had a lower symptom score (less GERD symptoms ) at 12 months. Antacid use was less in the LNF groupat 12 months compared with the LRYGB group , 7.14% vs 39.13% (Table II). Minor complications were higher in the LRYGB group vs LNF group (20.6 % vs 7.6%). However, major complication rate ( 2.1% vs 3.9%)were similar, and there wereno mortalities in either group.

Conclusions:LRYGBis as effective anantireflux procedure asLNF in the treatment of GERD,with the added benefit of resolving comorbidities associated with obesity. The LRYGB should be the first line treatment in patients with BMI > 35 with GERD.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P068

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search