• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Predictive Factors of Postoperative Ileus After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Predictive Factors of Postoperative Ileus After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

E Grzona, MD, F Carballo, MD, M Bun, A Canelas, MD, L Pereyra, MD, N Rotholtz, MD. Hospital Alemán de Buenos Aires

 

Background:

Postoperative ileus (PI) is defined as an interruption of bowel function after
surgery. It is the most important determinant of length of stay (LOS) after abdominal surgery, and thus has significant implications in hospital resource utilization. The pathogenesis is multifactorial. Predictive factors are not fully known. Although laparoscopic surgery reduces the recovery time of bowel transit it has also recorded PI rates.

Objective:

To evaluate the incidence and analyze predictive factors of PI after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods:

A retrospective study was performed using a prospective collected database of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal procedure between March 2000 and June 2011. PI was defined as a delay of the postoperative recovery time and bowel transit without a secondary etiology. The patients were divided in two groups: normal recovery (G1) and patients with PI (G2). As potential predictive factors for PI, demographic characteristics, surgery-related variables and disease-related variables were considered. Univariate analysis was performed to identify individual predictive risk factors for PI. Factors with p values below 0.05 were included in a regression model. The results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results:

A total of 869 patients were evaluated. 23 patients were excluded for secondary ileus. Median age was 58.7(15-92) years. 55.1% were men. The indications for surgery were: colorectal cancer 31.5%, diverticular disease 28.1%, polyps19.6%, inflammatory bowel disease 13%, others 7.8%. The procedures performed were: 399 (40%) left colectomies, 169 (20%) right colectomies, 120 (14.2%) proctectomies, 33 (3.9%) subtotal colectomies, 32 (3.7%) proctocolectomies, 25 (2.95 %) total colectomies, 18 (2.1%) segmentary colectomies, 16 (1.89%), Hartmann’s reversal, 15 (1.8%) ileocecal resections, 10 (1.2%) abdominoperineal resections and 3 (0, 35%) Hartmann’s procedures. 6% from all patients presented PI. There were no differences in demographics data between the groups (G1: 795; and G2: 51). Recovery parameters of bowel function were significantly shorter in G1 [Bowel sounds: 0.85 vs. 1.4 days (p <0.05), flatus 1.57 vs. 2.8 days (p <0.05), liquids intake 1.1 vs. 5.9 days, (p <0.05) solid intake 2.1 vs. 7.2 (p <0.05) days] and LOS [3.9 (2-8) vs. 9.43 (3-20) days (p <0.05)]. Surgical time >180 min [G1: 308/795 (38.7%) vs. G2: 28/51 (54.9%) OR 1.85 (CI: 1.05-3.25, p <0.05)], Conversion [G1: 73/795 (9.1%) vs. G2: 14/51 (27.45%) OR: 10.95 (CI 5.24-16.66, p <0.01)], left colectomy [G1: 386/795 (48.5%) vs. G2: 13/51 (25.5%) OR (-5.24) (CI: (-1.87) – (-8.61), p <0.01)] and total colectomy [G1: 20/795 (2.51%) vs. G2: 5/51 (9.8%), OR: 14.4 (CI: 3.33-25 .47, p <0.05)] showed association with PI in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of PI were total colectomy [OR: 13.5 (CI: 2.18-10.47)] and the conversion [OR: 3.84 (CI: 1.84-8.04)]; whereas left colectomy are a protector variable of PI [OR: 0.37 (CI: 18-75)].

Conclusion: Conversion to open surgery and total colectomy were independent predictive factors of PI, while left colectomy appears as an independent protective factor.

 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P111
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search