• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Pancreatic Fistula Rate Is Acceptable After Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery

Pancreatic Fistula Rate Is Acceptable After Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery

John A Stauffer, MD, Ross F Goldberg, MD, James M Parker, MD, Steven P Bowers, MD, C. Daniel Smith, MD, Horacio J Asbun, MD. Mayo Clinic, Florida

Introduction:
A vexing challenge of pancreatic surgery has been the development of pancreatic fistula. The rate of pancreatic fistula after traditional open distal or proximal pancreatic resection has been reported to be 13% in a recent review of nearly 4,000 patients. More recently, a minimally invasive approach to both distal and proximal pancreatic resection is being more frequently used. One of the advantages of a minimally invasive approach is less tissue trauma and a blunted inflammatory response. However, it has been postulated that a totally laparoscopic approach may have an increased rate of pancreatic fistula. The aim of our study was to determine the rate of pancreatic fistula for those patients who underwent totally laparoscopic non-robotic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) over a recent 1 year time period.

Methods and Procedures:
This is an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study from a single tertiary-carecenter. Between May 2009 and May 2010, sixty four patients underwent major pancreas resection by a single surgeon. Of these 64 patients, 41 underwent a totally laparoscopic approach (LDP and LPD) and comprise this study group. All patients undergoing LDP underwent staple transection at the neck or body of the pancreas using staple line reinforcement material. All patients undergoing LPD underwent reconstruction by laparoscopic duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy over a stent. All patients followed a standardized postoperative pathway. Thirty-day or inpatient complications were graded according to the Clavien scale. Pancreatic fistula was graded according to international consensus guidelines.

Results:
There were 18 males and 23 females with a mean age of 61.3 (range 17-85). Eight patients were ASA class II and 33 patients were ASA class III. Mean BMI was 28.3 (range 15-42). Five patients had a prior history of pancreatitis, 2 with recent acute and 3 chronic. Indications for surgery were: pancreatic adenocarcinoma (7), IPMN (8), neuroendocrine (6), benign (5), ampullary adenocarcinoma (4), and miscellaneous neoplasm (11). Twenty eight patients underwent LDP and 13 LPD. Average estimated blood loss was 143 mL (range 2-600). Mean ICU stay and overall length of stay was 0.3 days (range 0-6) and 5 days (range 2-10) respectively. Overall morbidity was seen in 11 (27%) and there were no mortalities or reoperations. Clavien grade I, II, and IIIa complications were seen in 3 (7.3%), 4 (9.8%), and 4 (9.8%) patients respectively. Pancreatic fistulas were seen in 4 (9.8%) patients and were grade A in 2 (1 LDP and 1 LPD) who required prolonged drainage, grade B in 1 (LDP) who required percutaneous drainage, and grade C in 1 (LPD) who required multiple percutaneous drainage and rehospitalization.

Conclusions:
Laparoscopic pancreatic resection can successfully be performed for a variety of indications and does not appear to have an increased rate of pancreatic fistula. Further refinements in technique may allow for more acceptance of a minimal access approach to pancreatic disease if other outcomes are also found to be comparable or improved when compared to open surgery.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P357
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals