• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Minimally Invasive Robotic Liver Resections for Benign and Malignant Tumors. Institutional Outcomes of The Modern Technique

Minimally Invasive Robotic Liver Resections for Benign and Malignant Tumors. Institutional Outcomes of The Modern Technique

Iswanto Sucandy, MD, Janelle D Spence, BA, Sydni Schlosser, Sharona B Ross, MD, Alexander S Rosemurgy, MD. Florida Hospital Tampa

Introduction: The nascent robotic approach for hepatic resections for benign and malignant liver tumors is gaining momentum because of perceived efficacy and utility with reduced morbidity. Herein, in considering this, we document our outcomes with robotic liver resections.

Methods: With IRB approval, all patients undergoing robotic liver resections are prospectively followed. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, such as operative duration and estimated blood loss, length of stay (LOS), complications, and 30-day readmissions were collected and analyzed. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD).

Results: 77 patients underwent robotic liver resections. Patients age was 63 (62.1 ± 13.9) years, 57% were women, BMI was 28 (29.7 ± 9.6) Kg/m2, ASA Class was 3 (2.5 ± 0.55), and MELD score was 7 (8.0 ± 2.9).  58 (75%) of the liver resections were undertaken for malignancy [hepatocellular carcinoma (36%), metastatic colorectal cancer (31%), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (10%), gallbladder cancer (7%), and other metastatic tumors (16%)], 7 (9%) were undertaken for premalignant lesions, and 12 (16%) were undertaken for benign lesions.  35% of patients underwent non-anatomical partial right hepatectomy, 21% non-anatomical partial left hepatectomy, 10% formal right hepatectomy, 13% formal left hepatectomy, and 12% central hepatectomy. 9% of patients underwent extended hepatectomy. Operative duration was 228 (264.5 ± 109.6) minutes and estimated blood loss was 150 (254.9 ± 300.4) ml. Conversion to an ‘open’ approach was necessary in two patients because of difficulty in assessing tumor margins and inability to reach a tumor located in segment 8, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 3 (4.9 ± 4.6) days. While there were no intraoperative complications, nine patients experienced postoperative complications (enterocutaneous fistula, respiratory failure, bile leak (n = 2), fluid collection (n = 2), pleural effusion, wound infection, and intra-abdominal abscess). Eight patients required readmission to the hospital within 30 days of discharge due to wound infection, bile leak, fluid collection, pneumonia, jaundice, and intractable vomiting.

Conclusion: Our data support that robotic liver resection is a safe and feasible technique in liver surgery with favorable short-term outcomes. Robotic surgical system enhances application of minimally invasive surgery for complex abdominal operation such as liver resection.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95768

Program Number: P690

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search