• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) is an effective treatment in patients with severe reflux disease

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) is an effective treatment in patients with severe reflux disease

Shahin Ayazi, MD, Ping Zheng, MD, Kirsten Newhams, MD, Fahim Habib, MD, Jonathan Levy, MD, Tameka Scott, DO, Kristy Chovanec, BS, Philip Jackson, BS, Yoshihiro Komatsu, MD, Toshitaka Hoppo, MD, Ali H Zaidi, MD, Blair A Jobe, MD. The Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network

Introduction: The performance and durability of the various types of fundoplication is variable when stratified by disease severity.  For example, partial fundoplication has been demonstrated to be an inadequate surgical treatment in patients with a very high DeMeester score (DS). To date, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been evaluated in this context and the majority of severe disease patients are referred for Nissen fundoplication.  We hypothesize that MSA is an effective treatment in patients with severe reflux.

Methods and procedures: Baseline clinical and objective data were prospectively collected in patients who underwent MSA between June 2013 and July 2017.  Outcomes were assessed using disease-specific questionnaires, upper endoscopy, pH monitoring, PPI use, and need for device removal. Based on previous studies, a DS≥50 was used as a cutoff to define severe disease. The study population was divided using this cutoff and outcomes were compared with those with less severe disease (DS<50).

Results: A total of 334 patients underwent MSA. The mean (SD) age was 52.7 (14.1) and 60% were female. There was no difference between groups in regard to age, BMI or duration of follow up (p>0.05). Patients with severe reflux had a higher mean preoperative DS compared to those with less severe disease [78.2 (11.1) vs. 22.8 (1.3), (p<0.0001)].  Patients with severe disease had a higher preoperative prevalence and severity grade of esophagitis [prevalence: 67% vs. 44%, p =0.0016, and combined LA grade C and D: 18% vs. 7%, p=0.0076)].

At a mean postoperative follow up of 13.6 (10.4) months, there was no difference between the GERD-HRQL total score in patients with severe disease compared to those with less severe disease [10.8 (12.9) vs. 9.8 (10.9), p=0.53]. This was also true for GERD-HRQL heartburn score [3.2 (6.0) vs. 3.2 (5.3), p=0.98] and RSI total score [8.1 (8.7) vs. 9.4 (8.8), p=0.32]. Postoperative DS was not different between groups [17.3 (23.0) vs. 14.1 (33.9), p=0.71], and there was no difference in the prevalence or grade of esophagitis [4 (20.0%) vs. 17 (15.0%), p=0.52], or PPI use [6 (11.5%) vs. 19 (8.2%), p=0.42]. There were similar rates of postoperative dysphagia (10% vs. 14%, p= 0.42) and need for device removal (3% vs. 5%, p= 0.63).

Conclusion: MSA is an effective treatment in patients with severe reflux disease and provides the same degree of clinical and objective improvement across the spectrum of disease severity.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94213

Program Number: P507

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search