• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Long term outcomes after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus hepaticoduodenostomy following laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in children

Long term outcomes after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus hepaticoduodenostomy following laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in children

Fanny Yeung, Patrick Ho Yu Chung, Adrian Chi Heng Fung, Kenneth Kak Yuen Wong, Paul Kwong Hang Tam, Professor. Queen Mary Hospital

Introduction: Choledochal cysts are congenital dilations of the biliary tree. Complete cyst excision and biliary-enteric reconstruction have been the standard operations for choledochal cyst. In our centre, more than 95% of choledochal cyst excision was performed laparoscopically.

Majority of the studies describe laparoscopic assisted reconstruction of the Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ), however only a few have studied laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) as an alternative method of biliary-enteric reconstruction.

In this study, we compared both the short-term and longer-term outcomes between laparoscopic HJ and HD reconstruction following choledochal cyst excision at our institution.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 54 children who had undergone laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision and biliary-enteric reconstruction between October 2004 and April 2018. Short-term outcomes including conversion, complications such as anastomotic leakage and bleeding, and hospital stays were analysed. Long-term outcomes including contrast reflux into biliary tree, cholangitis, anastomotic strictures and need of reoperation were analysed.

Results: Of the 54 patients, 21 of them underwent laparoscopic HD and 33 underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y HJ anastomosis reconstruction. There were no significant differences in gestation, gender, age at operation, antenatal diagnosis and Todani type of choledochal cyst between HD and HJ group.

Operative time was significantly shortened in HD group (186 minutes vs 367 minutes, p= 0.001). Conversion to open surgery was significantly higher in HJ group (64% vs 5%, p=0.001). Median intensive care unit (0.5 vs 1.9 days, p = 0.001) and hospital stay (7.5 vs 9.0 days, p = 0.019) were significantly shorter in HD group than HJ group. There were no perioperative deaths. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation (p = 0.743) and anastomotic stricture (p=0.097).

Postoperative upper contrast study showed contrast reflux into biliary tree in 56% of HD group patients and 15% of HJ group patients (p= 0.024). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in other long-term outcomes including cholangitis (p= 0.061), symptoms of recurrent abdominal pain (p=0.071), or need of reoperation (p=0.236). All patients had normal serum bilirubin level postoperative.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst with HD reconstruction is safe, feasible with better short-term outcomes than Roux-en-Y HJ reconstruction. Although HD group patients had a higher chance of contrast reflux into biliary tree radiologically, none of these patients experienced cholangitis clinically in the long-term at median follow-up duration of 54 months (IQR 13.75 to 84 months). Other long-term outcomes are comparable between HD and HJ groups.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 93838

Program Number: S017

Presentation Session: HPB

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search