• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias – Impact on Pulmonary Function

Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias – Impact on Pulmonary Function

Introduction: This study is to examine the impact of laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia on patient’s respiratory function and quality of life.

Methods: From 2004 to 2008, 30 consecutive patients with large paraesophageal hernia defined as >50% of stomach in the intrathoracic cavity with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in this study. All patients graded theirdyspnoea severity asan index of 1=no dyspnoea, 2=dyspnoea with exertion, 3=dyspnoea with basic activities or 4=dyspnoea at rest. All patients had a formal respiratory function test 1 week prior and 3 months after their laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. The patients had to rate their symptom severity and complete a quality of life questionnaire in the form of Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) preoperatively and then at 3-month, 6-month and thereafter yearly intervals postoperatively.

Results: There were no hospital mortality and the morbidity rate was 10%. In 26 patients with preoperative dyspnoea, 22 had complete resolution while the remaining 4 had experienced improvement in dyspnoea severity postoperatively. The mean dyspnoea severity index reduced from 2.4 to 1.3(p<0.001). Overall, there was 1%, 3% and 3% postoperative increase in FEV1, FVC and DLCO values for the whole group, none of which reached statistical significance. For the patients with resolution or improvement of their dyspnoea after the laparoscopic repair, no significant changes in their respiratory function parameters were demonstrated. The GIQLI score improved from a preoperative value of 85.7 to 107.9 postoperatively(p<0.001).

Table 1. Symptom outcomes (SI – Severity Index)

Symptoms

Preop No. of Patients

Postop No. of Patients Preop SI Mean Postop SI Mean

P Value

Heart burn 18 (60%) 5(16%) 2.2 1.3 P<0.001
Chest pain 16 (53%) 2 (3%) 2.0 1.1 P=0.001
Dysphagia 15 (50%) 2 (7%) 2.1 1.1 P=0.001
Regurgitation 10 (33%) 1 (3%) 1.7 1.0 P=0.008
Dyspnoea 26(87%) 4 (13%) 2.4 1.3 P<0.001

Table 2. Preoperative and postoperative FEV1, FVC and DLCO values for the 30 patients with large hiatal hernias

Variables Preop Mean Postop Mean % improvment P Value
FEV1 (Liters) 2.03 2.08 1% P=0.148
FVC (Liters) 2.6 2.7 3% P=0.121

DLCO (mL/mmHg/min)

18.0 18.6 3% P=0.264

Table 3. Preoperative and postoperative FEV1, FVC and DLCO values for the 30 patients divided into 3 groups according to their dyspnoea response (n=number)

Variables Preop Mean Postop Mean % Improvement P Value
Patients with no initial dyspnoea (n=4)
FEV1 (Liters) 2.25 2.3 2% P=0.287
FVC (Liters) 2.65 2.75 4% P=0.187
DLCO (mL/mmHg/min) 21.3 20.4 -4% P=0.465
Patient with dyspnoea improved (n=4)
FEV1 (Liters) 1.81 1.81 0% P=0.670
FVC (Liters) 2.1 2.2 4% P=0.114
DLCO (mL/mmHg/min) 15.7 16.3 4% P=0.439
Paitents with dyspnoea resolved (n=22)
FEV1 (Liters) 2.05 2.12 2% P=0.441
FVC (Liters) 2.54 2.62 4% P=0.09
DLCO (mL/mmHg/min) 19.2 20.1 3% P=0.537

Conclusions: We failed to show a significant change in patient’s respiratory function despite a clearly demonstrated improvement of their respiratory symptoms. Alternative reasons for the reduction of dyspnoea severity should be sought. Laparoscopic hernia repair is also a safe procedure that can lead to better patient quality of life.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S078

906

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related



Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals