• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Dual Academic Institutional Experience of Secondary Operations after Sleeve Gastrectomy

Dual Academic Institutional Experience of Secondary Operations after Sleeve Gastrectomy

Victoria Lyo, MD1, Ryan Macht2, Yalini Vigneswaran1, Andrew Posselt2, Jonathan Carter2, Stanley Rogers2, Andrea Stroud1, Stephanie Wood1, Farah Husain1. 1OHSU, 2UCSF

INTRODUCTION: Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric operation performed, patients can experience severe GERD, strictures, insufficient weight loss, and leaks. The incidence, indications, and patient outcomes of a secondary operation or conversion to bypass are not well understood.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We reviewed institutional MBSAQIP data from two academic, tertiary referral centers for bariatric operations between 2014-2018. We identified patients who underwent secondary operations after LSG and evaluated their demographics and early postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS: Of the 1713 bariatric operations performed, 316 (18.4%) were secondary after prior bariatric surgery: 165 after gastric banding, 82 after bypass, and 55 after LSG. We identified 49 operations after LSG in 42 patients, excluding six port-site hernia repairs. Seven of the 49 cases were washouts or tube placements in duplicate patients. Most LSGs (32/49, 65.3%) were performed outside of our institutions. Mean time to revisions was 2.7 years (range: 0.23-9.1 years).

Among the 42 reoperative LSG patients, 32 (76.2%) had conversions from sleeve to bypass. Of these conversions, three had concurrent HH repairs and one had a concurrent Heller myotomy. The remaining 10 patients had: four HH repairs, two gastroplasties, one incisural seromyotomy, one sleeve fundal revision, one conversion to esophago-jejunostomy for a chronic GC fistula, and one gastrobronchial fistula takedown.

Most patients had multiple indications for reoperation. Grouped by primary indication, the most frequent reason for surgery after LSG was GERD in 17 patients, four of whom had esophagitis, four HHs, and three inadequate weight loss. Of all patients with GERD (26 patients), 84.6% had their symptoms resolve with reoperation. Two of the four without resolution of GERD had a sleeve revision or HH repair alone.

Of the nine patients who had incisural strictures, six had resolution of oral intolerance after revision; three patients had persistent nausea with no strictures on EGD.  All eight patients undergoing conversions for inadequate weight loss (baseline BMI 56.7kg/m2 to post-LSG BMI 48.8, EBWL 21.1%) had successful weight loss to an average BMI of 44.7 and EBWL to 40.2%. One of seven reoperations for fistulas or leaks failed leak closure. Among all reoperative 42 patients, 14 patients (33.3%) had complications requiring further procedures.

CONCLUSION: Symptoms and complications after LSG can persist and these patients may need secondary operations. At our tertiary bariatric centers, secondary operations successfully treated the primary indications for reoperation and should be offered, but can be challenging with higher complication rates.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94910

Program Number: P189

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search