• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Consecutive 87 Cases of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Changes of Clinical Outcomes and Its Implication for Clinical Application

Consecutive 87 Cases of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Changes of Clinical Outcomes and Its Implication for Clinical Application

Song Cheol Kim, MD, Hae Ran Ha, RN, Hae R Seo, RN, Gi B Song, MD, Yong S Jung, MD, Yong H Kim, MD, Jae Bum Park, MD, Duck J Han, MD, Yun B, Choi. Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine

 

Introduction Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy have been regarded as an one of most challenging laparoscopic surgery. There have been only a few reports on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) from experienced centers, and many have reported unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. Moreover there are no analytical reports according to time experience and its clinical implication. Aim of this study is to analysis the clinical outcomes of consecutive 87 cases of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy chronologically and clinical feasibility and effectiveness
Method: Eighty-seven patients with benign or malignant lesions of the pancreatic head underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with or without pylorus preservation from Jun 2007. Most of them were performed with totally intracorporeal method except initial 10 cases, which had been performed with extracorporeal pancreaticojejunostomy. Because our series were mainly benign and low grade malignant lesion in pancreatic head, we analyzed the technical safety and effectiveness ,apart from oncologic outcomes. We regard that this point of view is the first step for approving the safety and effectiveness of this complex procedure
Results: Main indications were benign or low grade malignant diseases, such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN, n=38), solitary pseudopapillary tumor (n=13), neuroendocrine tumor (n=13), and others. There were 7 cases of peri-amupllary carcinoma. Mean operation time was 8.4 hrs, which was decreased year by year from 9.3 hr in 2007 to 6.5 hr in 2011. Oral intake was started on postoperative 3 days. Mean hospital stay was 15.2 days. Hospital stay was also shortened annually from 20.2 days in 2007 to 10.2 days in 2011. There was one case of mortality from postoperative bleeding in early stage. Rate of total surgical complication showed 30.8%, including 6.1 % of pancreatic fistula (ISGPF criteria). Total morbidity was also reduced from 30 % in 2007 to 16% in 2011.When data after learning period (in 2011) compared to open PD performed during the same period, it did not show difference in terms of operation time and morbidity rate, and showed significantly shorter hospital stays and cosmetic effect
Conclusion: This study reflects that LPD after some learning period can be adopted as a safe and effective clinical procedure for selected pancreatic head lesions. However further well- designed studies remain as a key factor for the LPD to be a wide accepted clinical procedure

 


Session Number: SS03 – HPB (Hepatobiliary and Pancreas)
Program Number: S014

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search