• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

COMPARISON OF THERMAL SPREAD BETWEEN BIPOLAR VESSEL SEALING SYSTEM AND ULTRASONIC SCISSORS: SIGNIFICANT CORRELATION WITH POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY

Kazuo Koyanagi, MD, PhD1, Soji Ozawa, MD, PhD, FACS2, Fumihiko Kato, MD1, Jun Kanamori, MD1, Hiroyuki Daiko, MD, PhD1, Yuji Tachimori, MD, PhD3. 1Department of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, 3Cancer Care Center, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital

INTRODUCTION: Temporal and spatial tissue temperature profile in electrosurgical devises, such as ultrasonic scissors and bipolar vessel sealing system, was experimentally measured, and the incidence of postoperative complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy was assessed according to the electrosurgical devises used.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Experiment of thermal spread: Sonicision (Sonic) was used for ultrasonic scissors and LigaSure (LS) was used for bipolar vessel sealing system. Each device was activated in order to cut porcine muscle at room temperature. Temperatures of both the device blade and porcine tissues beside the device were measured using a temperature probe. Each experiment was performed at least three times. Room temperature was 25 degrees. Clinical analysis: The 46 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection in the prone position were selected in the study. Incidence of postoperative complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy was compared according to electrosurgical devises. Bronchoscopy was used for diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP). Sonic and LS was employed in 6 and 40 patients, respectively.

RESULTS: Temperature of active blade and tissue pad of Sonic after 3 seconds of activation time was 100 and 68.8 degrees, respectively. That of blade of LS after single activation (approximately 3 seconds) was 44.7 degrees (Sonic vs. LS; P < 0.001). Temperature of active blade of Sonic after 10 seconds of activation time increased to 270 degrees. On the other hand, that of blade of LS after three times of activation (approximately 10 seconds) was 52.1 degrees (Sonic vs. LS; P < 0.001). Tissue temperature spreads of 1mm and 2mm lateral to Sonic were 50.8 and 44.6 degrees, respectively. Those to LS were 39.1 and 31.4 degrees, respectively (Sonic vs. LS; P = 0.001). Tissue temperature spread of 1mm ahead to Sonic and LS was 39.2 and 29.2 degrees (P = 0.004). Overall postoperative complications occurred in 3 (50%) and 11 (27.5%) in the Sonic and LS group, respectively (P = 0.056). Incidence of RLNP and anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in the Sonic group than in the LS group (RLNP, 3 (50%) vs. 6 (15%), P = 0.043; anastomotic leakage, 3 (50%) vs. 4 (10%), P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS: LS might be beneficial to thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position in terms of thermal spread from energy device. Appropriate temporal and spatial distance from electrosurgical devises to important mediastinal structure, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve and tracheobronchial membrane, was required for avoiding postoperative complications.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87546

Program Number: P510

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

47

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2018 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons