• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparative analysis of the Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch 300cm common channel to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 18 months postoperative data illustrating weight loss, risk profile, and nutritional status

Comparative analysis of the Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch 300cm common channel to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 18 months postoperative data illustrating weight loss, risk profile, and nutritional status

Paul E Enochs, MD, FACS, FASMBS, David Pilati, MD, AFACS, Jon Bruce, MD, FACS, FASMBS, Scott Bovard, MD, FACS, FASMBS, Michael Tyner, MD, FASMBS. Bariatric Specialists of North Carolina

Background: A modification of the duodenal switch (MDS) utilizing a single anastomosis with 300cm common channel has been gaining popularity since first described by Dr. Torres in 2007. This procedure has gone by many names, including the single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI) and most recently, the Stomach, Intestinal, and Pylorus Sparing procedure (SIPS). However, there are very few studies illustrating definitive results of these procedures.

Methods: Utilizing our internal practice database and electronic medical records, clinical data was obtained for our set of 150 MDS patients who underwent a primary procedure at Centers of Excellence between July 2014 and July 2015. These results were compared with established data found in the literature discussing outcomes of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), laparoscopic roux- en-y gastric bypass (RYGBP), and laparoscopic traditional duodenal switch (DS) procedures. The main outcomes evaluated at 18 months included excess weight loss; 30 day, 6 month, and 1 year readmission and reoperation rates; resolution of comorbidities; as well as postoperative metabolic and nutritional status.

Results: We analyzed 150 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic MDS procedure and compared them to similar patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGBP), or laparoscopic duodenal switch (DS). The EWL in MDS patients at 18 months is similar to DS and greater than SG or RYGBP, while the risk profile, although slightly more than SG, is less than that of RYGBP or DS. The resolution of comorbidities is comparable across procedures as a function of weight loss, yet when focused specifically on diabetes, the MDS appears to show a greater percent resolution than RYGBP and is comparable with DS. At 18 months there have been no appreciable metabolic or nutritional deficiencies as compared to SG or RYGBP and when compared to DS, the metabolic and nutrition profile (specifically fat soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K) is superior at 18 months.

Conclusion: The use of laparoscopic malabsorptive procedures has been increasing on a national level. Compared with our other bariatric procedures, specifically the RYGBP and DS, the Modified Duodenal Switch is associated with a lower risk profile, an equivalent or improved nutritional status, and increased weight loss. Further studies will help to definitively define the role of this promising new procedure and how it plays within our bariatric armamentarium.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 79180

Program Number: S020

Presentation Session: Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

Presentation Type: Podium

107

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals