• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Common Bile Duct Injuries: Why are they still common?

Common Bile Duct Injuries: Why are they still common?

Reid Fletcher, MD, MPH1, Chandler Cortina, MD1, Hannah Kornfeld, MD1, Ruojia Li, MD1, Antonios Varelas1, Lauren Willoughby1, Benjamin Veenstra, MD1, Steven Bonomo, MD2. 1Rush University, 2John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County

Introduction: The incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not changed significantly in the past 2 decades despite increased operative experience and technical refinement.  We sought to evaluate factors which might predict BDI, assess how surgeons manage injuries, and to evaluate if there is a role for minimally invasive repair. 

Methods: An online survey was sent to surgeons belonging to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) via e-mail.  Survey items included personal experience with BDIs, how injuries were addressed, and surgeon attitude toward minimally invasive repair of BDIs. Descriptive statistics as well as univariate and multivariate regressions were created to identify factors associated with bile duct injuries. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12/SE (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Results: The survey was sent to 3411 surgeons with 559 complete responses (16.5%). The mean age of respondents was 48.7 years with an average time in practice of 16.1 years. Most respondents (61.2%) had fellowship training.

Forty-seven percent of surgeons surveyed experienced a BDI in their career with 17.1% of surgeons experiencing more than one. The majority of BDIs were identified in the operating room (64.5%). Of those identified in the operating room, 66.9% were repaired immediately. When repair was undertaken immediately, 69.5% of these repairs were performed in an open technique, with 41.6% of repairs done in consultation with a senior partner. While a majority of surgeons (57.7%) felt that BDIs could theoretically be repaired laparoscopically, only 25% of those surgeons had actually done so in practice.

In multivariate logistic regression, number of years in practice was associated with an increased risk of BDI (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) whereas having any type of fellowship training was associated with a decreased risk of BDI (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 – 0.76). Compared with those in academic practice, surgeons in private practice were at a significantly increased risk of having experienced a BDI (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.31 – 3.61). The number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies or advanced laparoscopic cases performed per year were both independent of risk of BDI.

Conclusion: Nearly half of those surveyed had experienced a BDI during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Duration of clinical practice and community/private practice setting were associated with an increased risk of BDI, while fellowship training and academic practice setting conferred a protective effect. These findings could be used to focus continuing education programs for those populations most at risk.  


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 93679

Program Number: S002

Presentation Session: Biliary

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search