• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Suture Mesh Fixation Vs Tacker Mesh Fixation for Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional and Ventral Hernias

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Suture Mesh Fixation Vs Tacker Mesh Fixation for Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional and Ventral Hernias

Background
Recurrence is one of the major problems after open incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair has brought down the recurrence rate to less than 10%. The main causes of recurrence have been inadequate mesh size, fixation of mesh and patient factors. The issue of mesh fixation to the abdominal wall in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is an area of ongoing debate. This prospective randomized study was done to compare the intra operative and post operative outcomes between two mesh fixation techniques in laparoscopic repair- Trans-fascial sutures alone vs Tacks and four corner sutures.

Methods
The study was conducted in a single surgical unit between 1st April 2007 to 31st May 2009. 50 patients were randomized using random numbers generated from www.randomisation.com and divided into two groups (Group I- tacker + four corner suture and Group II -suture fixation alone). Patients with defect size less than or equal to 25 cm2 were included in the study. Recurrent incisional hernias and patients with significant co morbidities were excluded from the study. In group I four corner polypropylene sutures and a double crown of tackers was used. In group II, for suture fixation, 2-0 polypropylene sutures were placed using modified epidural needle or a suture passer and were placed at a distance of 1.5 to 2 cm. Various intra operative variables and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. The variables were compared using chi – square and unpaired Student’s‘t’ test for qualitative and quantitative parameters as appropriate. A ‘p’ value of <0.05 was considered significant. Mann Whitney test was used for the comparative data analysis.
Results
Fifty patients were randomized into two groups with 26 patients in Group I and 24 in Group II. The mean age of the patients was 46.3 years with a male to female ratio of 1: 2.1. Incisional hernia (60%) was the most common type seen in both the groups followed by primary ventral hernias (40%). The operative time was significantly higher in Group II (50 min. vs 76.3 min., p=0.001). Patients in Group I had significantly higher pain scores at 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively (p=0.001,p=0.0001, p=0.001, p=0.009 respectively). The incidence of seroma was higher in Group II (20.8% vs 11.5%, p=0.46). The cost of surgery was higher in Group I compared to Group II with a cost difference of about $2600 per procedure between the two groups.
Conclusions
For small and medium sized defects in anatomically accessible areas, suture fixation is a feasible alternative to tacker fixation in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with a significant advantage in early postoperative pain and significant cost reduction.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S023

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search