• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Case Control Comparison of Laparoscopic (LX) and Open (OP) Approach for the Surgical Management of Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO)

A Case Control Comparison of Laparoscopic (LX) and Open (OP) Approach for the Surgical Management of Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO)

Background: LX offers enhanced recovery and better cosmesis. Reduction in postoperative adhesions and incisional hernia rates are potential long term benefits. Previous studies have shown that laparoscopic management of SBO is feasible and associated with acceptable morbidity. However, rates of conversion to OP are higher than in other laparoscopic procedures. Data comparing short and long term results of LX and OP in SBO are limited.
Objectives: To identify risk factors for conversion, investigate its consequences, and compare short and long term outcomes of LX and OP.
Methods:
Patients who were operated for a diagnosis of SBO in either an attempted LX or OP were retrospectively identified. Data collected included patients demographics and comorbidities, indication for surgery, operative details, and postoperative recovery. Long term data including recurrent SBO, reoperations, and incisional hernias were obtained using patient charts and a telephone survey.LX and OPpatients were matched (1:1) for age and the extent of previous abdominal operations (no surgery; minor surgery; laparotomy; multiple laparotomies). Short and long term results in both groups were analyzed according to intension to treat. Results: From 1998 to 2007, 202 patients were operated for SBO (90 attempted LX, 112 OP). Most common etiologies for SBO in the LX group included adhesions (85.5%), malignancy (2.2%), and internal hernia (2.2%). 29 (32%) patients in the LX group were converted to an open procedure. Causes of conversion were dense adhesions (31%), need for bowel resection (17%), unidentified etiology (24%), and iatrogenic injury (28%).
Preoperative patient characteristics and the extent of previous surgery were not associated with conversion (previous laparotomy 27% vs. 18%, p=0.3, conversion vs. non-conversion, respectively).
Patients converted from laparoscopy to open surgery had longer operations (92.0±28.7 vs. 48.7±22.0 min, p<0.0001), higher postoperative complication rate (45% vs. 18%, p=0.015), and a tendency for longer postoperative stay compared with non-converted patients (8.8±11.8 vs. 5.1±8.6 days, respectively, p=0.09).
Matched LX (n= 71, age 59.3±20.7, male 39%) and OP (n= 71, age 60.9±20.4, male 34%) patients had similar comorbidity profile and comparable intraoperative findings. Operative time was similar in both groups (62 LX vs. 64 OP, min, p=0.76). LX patients had lower total rate of postoperative complications (32% vs. 51%, p=0.03), and earlier passage of flatus (median postoperative day 2 vs. 3, p<0.01) and stool (2 vs. 4, p<0.01). Postoperative hospital stay was comparable (6.1±8.6 vs. 6.8±2.7 days, p=0.55, LX vs. OP, respectively). 59 (83%) LX and 51 (72%) OP patients were available for long term follow up (median 51 months). During this time 3.4% (LX) and 17.6% (OP) were admitted for SBO (P=0.03). 1 (LX) and 3 (OP) patients required re-operation for SBO (NS). Incisional hernia rates were comparable.
Conclusions:
Successful laparoscopic management of SBO is possible in patients after major abdominal surgery. Laparoscopy may enhance postoperative intestinal recovery, and reduce perioperative morbidity and long term risk for recurrent SBO. Conversion to an open approach might be associated with increased morbidity but is difficult to predict. Further investigation is required for better selection of patients for laparoscopy.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S089

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search