Presented by David W. Rattner, MD at the SAGES 2013 Annual Meeting; SAGES/ISLCRS/ASCRS Symposium – Optimizing Outcomes in Rectal Cancer
disclosures–9 sec
NOTES: The expectation–14 sec http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17321258
SAGES/ASGE white paper on NOTES http://www.noscar.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/NOTES_White_Paper_Feb06
Keyword(s): achalasia, anal device, Annals of Surgery, appendix, ASCRS, Barcelona, Brazil, colorectal, conventional lap techniques, cosmesis, culture of safety, device development, down-to-up, endoscope, Europe, FDA, four-port LC, GB, German registry, GIE, high risk, hybrid, hybrid NOTES CCX, insurance companies, international prospective multicenter trial, interventional endoscopy, investigational use, IRB protocol, ISLCRS, Lacy/Sylla surgical technique, lap assistance, lap assisted, lap colectomy, lap surgery, LC, LN, MA-NOS, margins, matched-paired analysis, medical devices, mesorectal envelope, mesorectal fascia, natural orifice, NOSCAR, NOTES, NOTES CCX, NOTES transanal rectal cx resection, NYT, oncologic data, oncologic resection, pathology, pharyngeal lacerations, POEM, prospective cohort study, RCT, recovery, rectal cx, rectal NOTES, rectum, regulatory bodies, reimbursement, retraction, SAGES/ASGE white paper on NOTES, single incision LC, South America, sphincters, stomach, stones, Surgical Endoscopy, TATA, TME dissection, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, transcolonic, transgastric, transgastric CCX, transrectal NOTES TME, transvaginal hybrid techniques, TVC, U.S.
