This talk was presented at the 2018 SAGES Meeting/16th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery by David Kooby during the Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection: Present and Future on April 13 2018
Keyword(s): academic medical center, Africa, Asia, best practice, blood loss, Brazil, cancer outcomes, CME, complications, consensus conference, console, continuing medical education, conversion, cost, credentialing, curriculum, delphi, Denmark, faculty, haptic feedback, hepatico-pancreatico-biliary surgery, HPB fellow, hybrid, IDEAL framework, innovation, Lancet, laparoscopy, learning curve, length of stay, LOS, lymph nodes, mentor, metrics, mini laparotomy, minimally invasive pancreatic resection, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy, minimally invasive surgeons, minimally invasive Whipple, MIPD, MIPR, MIS surgeons, myHPB, Netherlands, open surgery, operative time, Oregon, PANCAN, Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, patient selection, Portland, prospective randomized trial, psychomotor performance, QoL, quality of life, reconstruction, research, resident, robot, robot-assisted, robotic, robotic HPB surgery, robotics, Seattle, simulator, spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy, standardization, survey, teaching, training, video assessment
Terminology framework–5:14 HPB 2017
International survey–5:32 HPB 2017 van Hilst
Cost data for MIPR–7:43 HPB 2017 Conlon
HPB fellowship experience for distal pancreatectomy–9:16 HPB Hogg
Components of robotic training–10:00
Organized dissemination of MIPR–11:04 Ann Surg 2016
IDEAL framework–11:25 Lancet 2009