Presented by Karen D Horvath at the AHPBA Joint Panel: Contemporary Themes in Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery held during the 2017 SAGES Annual Meeting in Houston, TX on Friday, March 24, 2017
Keyword(s): acute pancreatitis, anasarca, APA, ASGE, Atlanta re-classification project, axios stents, clinical, communication, complications, consensus guidelines, CT scan, death, debride, delay, demarcation, diabetes, diuresis, double pigtail stents, drain, drainage, Dutch, encapsulation, endoscopic management, endoscopic transgastric debridement, ERCP, exocrine sufficiency, flank incision, healthcare, IAP, iatrogenic infection, ICU, IEP, inflammatory process, intensive care unit, interstitial edematous pancreatitis, intervention, invasive, laparoscopic guidance, midaxillary line, minimally invasive, MIS, mortality, MRI, multidisciplinary team, necrosectomy, necrotizing pancreatitis, open surgery, pancreatectomy, pancreatic duct stent, pancreatic necrosis, Panther trial, PCD, percutaneous catheter drainage, percutaneous drains, psuedocyst, randomized controlled trial, RCT, research, retroperitoneal, specimen, standardized care pathway, step-up approach, sterile necrosis, training, transgastric procedures, treatment, VARD, walled off necrosis, WON, worldwide
New nomenclature–40 sec Arch Surg 1993
Acute pancreatitis–1:11
Fluid collection–2:43
Sterile necrosis–3:13 Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006
Evolution of timing for intervention–4:47 Arch Surg 2007
Sequential CTs of severe necrotizing pancreatitis–6:07
Early phase invasive intervention–6:44 Crit Care 2005
Optimal intervention strategies for infected WON–7:46
Perc catheter drainage–8:41 AJR 1998
MIS debridement options: Step-up to VARD–10:19
VARD pancreatitis–10:41
Phase III RCT–11:25 NEJM 2010
Step-up VARD advantages–12:07
Consensus guidelines for SAP–13:38
Summary–14:17