• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Which Case of Preoperative Suspected Gallbladder Cancer Is Most Appropriate for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ?

Which Case of Preoperative Suspected Gallbladder Cancer Is Most Appropriate for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The surgical procedure for gallbladder cancer is still difficult to improve a prognosis. Otherwise, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is possible to get complete cure in some cases of early cancer. The present study aims to clarify the appropriate case for LC by evaluating the preoperative suspected gallbladder cancer and its clinicopathological finding. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with gallbladder cancer who underwent cholecystectomy from 1981 to 2007 at Kitasato university east hospital in Japan. The histopathological finding clarified the horizontal carcinomatous spread and invasion depth in the 53 cases precisely. We classified those macroscopic configuration and the characteristic. Long-term survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in group of survivors were compared by the log-rank test. RESULT: 43 cases of protruding lesion and 10 cases of wall thickness and flat invasive lesion (WT) were defined. The protruding lesions were classified into 3 subclass, such as pedicle type (PD, n=7), nodular type (ND, n=25) and papillary type (PP, n=11). ND and PP were sessile lesions. Particularly, the cancer nest was localized in the basal point with PD. On the other hand, the size of cancer spread in ND, PP, WT were 5.8}3.5~4.0}2.0, 4.8}2.8~4.0}1.9, 5.6}2.6~5.1}2.6 (cm), respectively. These sizes of spreading part were 3 to 6 times of the protruding part. The frequency of case beyond pT2 cancer was 0% (PD), 91% (ND), 82.8% (PP), 90% (WT). Patients with pT1 tumor who underwent no additional surgery, are alive without recurrence. In patients with pT2 cancer, the 5-year survival rate was 52.6%. Furthermore, those with pT3 lesions had poor prognoses (MST; 12 months). CONCLUSION: Also the regional lymphadenectomy is necessary for the cases of pT2 cancer. There is much frequency of advanced cancer with sessile lesion and flat lesion. However, all cases with macroscopic pedicle type were pT1 cancer. Thus, the case with pedicle lesion is optimal for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P421

61


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons