• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Vagotomy Vs Nonvagotomy in Gastric Bypass Surgery

Vagotomy Vs Nonvagotomy in Gastric Bypass Surgery

Objective: Post bariatric symptoms related to dumping syndrome were compared in Nonvagotomized Laparoscopic Roux en Y Gastric Bypass (NVLGB) patients and Vagotomized Laparoscopic Roux en Y Gastric Bypass (VLGB) patients.
Methods: A questionnaire was given to patients during follow up appointments at 24 to 30 months after LRYGB treated with both NVLGB and VLGB. 48 responses were reviewed in patients who underwent VLGB. 64 responses were analyzed in NVLGB. The questionnaire addressed frequency of post bariatric symptoms related to the consumption of high caloric foods. PC SAS version 9.1.3 was used for all analyses. Fishers Exact Test or Chi-square tests were used to determine if vagotomy status and symptom episodes (categorized as none, low, mid, high, and always) were independent of each other.
Results: The nonvagotomized patients had significantly less symptoms than the vagotomized patients for 11 out of the 17 symptoms that were queried. There was no significant difference in symptom frequency between the vagotomized vs. nonvagotomized patients for 6/17 symptoms. NVLGB patients were less likely to experience diarrhea, abdominal cramping, nausea, flushing, dizziness, and sleepiness in association with high caloric foods compared to VLGB patients (76.6 %, 62.5 %, 54.7 %, 67.2 %, 65.6 %, 62.5 % vs. 10.4 %, 20.8 %, 18.8 %, 25 %, 27.1 %, 29.2 %). Loss of excess body weight was also compared in the 2 groups, the VLGB patients’ loss 71% ± 4 of EBW, compared to 68 % ± 6 in the NVLGB patients.
Conclusion: This study showed that NVLGB patients are able to enjoy all types of foods and less frequently experience the unpleasant symptoms VLGB patients experience with ingestion of sweets. Dumping syndrome has been proposed by some to lead to greater weight loss in RYGB patient through negative feedback. However the association of weight loss and dumping syndrome has never been clearly linked. In our patient population there was not a significant difference in loss of excess body weight between NVGLB, and VLGB patients.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P031

View Poster

996


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons