• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The role of intraoperative colonoscopy after colorectal anastomosis

The role of intraoperative colonoscopy after colorectal anastomosis

Yoo Sung Lee, Hyung Jin Kim, Seung Rim Han, Ri-Na Yoo, Gun Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho. Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea

Introduction: Anastomotic complication after stapled anastomosis in colorectal cancer surgery is a considerable problem. There are various types of anastomotic complication and they have different severity. This study was aimed to evaluate the impact of intraoperative colonoscopy on detection of anastomotic complication, and its effectiveness in treatment of anastomotic complications after anterior resection (AR) and low anterior resection (LAR) for colorectal cancer intraoperatively.

Methods: From Dec. 2016 to Jul. 2017, a total of 72 patients who underwent anastomosis between sigmoid colon and rectum after colorectal resection were reviewed retrospectively. Intraoperative colonoscopy was performed routinely since December 2016 in our hospital after anterior resection and low anterior resection. To identify effectiveness of intraoperative colonoscopy, we compared postoperative complications with non-intraoperative colonoscopy group during previous 11 months. Intraoperative colonoscopy was performed after anastomosis to visualize the anastomosis line and to perform an air leakage test. If anastomotic defect and moderate bleeding were found in intraoperative colonoscopy, it was managed by means of reinforcement suture or transanal suture repair. We used Logistic regression to analyze anastomotic complication between two groups with or without intraoperative colonoscopy.

Results: Of the 72 patients who were performed intraoperative colonoscopy after AR (n=50) and LAR (n=22), abnormal findings including bleeding and air leak were found in 14 patients (19.4%). Among those, 9 cases were observed without any procedure, additional procedures were performed in 5 patients (6.9%, transanal suture (3), Lembert suture (2)). Postoperative complication was developed in 12 patients; 6 patients had anastomosis bleeding (8.3%), 2 patients had ileus (2.8%), 1 patient had pneumonia (1.4%), 3 patients had minor complication (4.2%, acute urinary retention, chylous drainage, laparoscopic port site bleeding). Among 6 patients who had anastomosis bleeding, 4 patients were treated by endoscopic clipping, 2 patients were cured by conservative treatment. There was no postoperative anastomotic leakage. The cases of AR and LAR were 62 and 48 in non-intraoperative colonoscopy group, there was no significant difference between two group (P=0.07). The proportion of laparoscopic surgery was 86.4% and 92.2% on intraoperative colonoscopy and non-intraoperative colonoscopy group, respectively, there was significant difference statistically (P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in anastomotic complication rate between two groups. (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.34-2.585).

Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in postoperative anastomotic complication rate between two groups, intraoperative colonoscopy may be valuable method for decreasing postoperative complication by visualizing anastomosis line and performing additional procedure.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88303

Program Number: P245

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

102


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons