• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Surgical technique and outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Surgical technique and outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Junichi Hasegawa, MD, Shingo Noura, MD, Masaki Hirota, MD, Tae Matsumura, MD, Chikato Koga, MD, Chizu Kameda, MD, Masahiro Murakami, MD, Ryouhei Kawabata, MD, Masato Yoshikawa, MD, Junzo Shimizu. Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital

Aim: The aim of this study is to examine the clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy in a consecutive series of elderly patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Method: Sixteen patients (all women; median age 79 years, rage 72-92 years, median ASA Grade 2.) underwent laparoscopic rectopexy to treat rectal prolapse between April 2013 and August 2015. The median prolapse size was 10 [5-20] cm, and five patients (31.3%) had previous prolapse surgery. Five patients (31.3%) had undergone pervious pelvic surgery, the most common of which was hysterectomy, performed for 4 patients. Symptomatic and functional data were collected prospectively before and after surgery. Anorectal physiology was assessed by manometry (maximum resting pressures, MRP, and maximum squeeze pressure, MSP).

Results: Laparoscopic rectopexy with posterior mesh fixation were performed in 14 patients and suture rectopexy in one. Conversion to open technique was needed in one patient that underwent the suture rectopexy with sigmoidectomy. One patient who could not undergo bowel preparation due to dementia, was complicated with stercoraceous perforation of the rectum three days after operation and died. Small bowel obstruction was conservatively treated in one patient. Anal incontinence improved in 5 of 6 patents (83%). Six patients (37.5%) were constipated after surgery. MRP and MSP had improved after surgery.: MRP from a mean of 19.6±3.1 mmHg (rage 15-25 mmHg) before surgery to 24.0±13.4 mmHg (10-50 mmHg) at 1month and 28.3±12.4 mmHg (10-43 mmHg) 6 months after surgery; MSP from 127.1±72.4 (60-277 mmHg) before surgery to 143.4±80.1 mmHg (75-307 mmHg) at 1month and 173.6±90.7 mmHg (93-359 mmHg) 6 months after surgery. At 10 months, none experienced persistence or recurrence of rectal prolapse.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic rectopexy as treatment for rectal prolapse resulted in an improvement in anal incontinence and satisfactory control of prolapse.

1,602


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons