• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Internal Hemorrhoids Refractory to Hemorrhoidal Banding

Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Internal Hemorrhoids Refractory to Hemorrhoidal Banding

Anjani Thakur, MD, Spencer W Levesque

Valley Vein Health Center

AIM: Symptoms of prolapsing-internal-hemorrhoids persist in some patients post hemorrhoidal banding (HB) therapy necessitating re-intervention with stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH). We evaluated the success rate of HB, causes for re-intervention, and satisfaction with SH.

METHOD: Between November 2010 and October 2011, 211 patients with stage 3 internal hemorrhoids underwent HB. Nineteen (9%) of these patients, aged 18-77 years, went on to require SH for persistent symptoms. All these patients had resolution of hemorrhoids at 3 weeks postoperatively. Twelve of these patients, nine females and two males, participated in a telephone survey. Data were collected on postoperative pain, frequency of bowel movements, pain with bowel movements, frequency of blood in stool (if any), presence of external hemorrhoids, use of stool softeners at week three and week six after surgery, complications, time to functional recovery/return to work, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS: 192 patients (91 %) had successful resolution of symptoms following HB. The indications for SH were continued bleeding or pain. The pain post-SH was well tolerated, with four of the nineteen patients needing pain medication refills. Of the twelve patients who participated in the telephone survey, frequency of bowel movements was an average of 2.5 per day at 3 weeks and 2.15 at six weeks. Five patients had pain with defecation at three weeks and six. Four had blood in stool at three weeks, and five at week six. Five had external hemorrhoids at weeks three and six. Seven needed stool softeners at three weeks and six at week six. Average time to functional recovery/return to work was 14.4 days. Satisfaction was 80%.

CONCLUSION: A small percentage of patients require further treatment for internal hemorrhoids which prove refractory to HB treatment. One option for these patients is SH, which is a safe and effective treatment. SH surgery is low risk, has few complications, and has an overall good satisfaction rate with short functional recovery/return to work time.


Session: Poster Presentation

Program Number: P027

2,153


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons