• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Robotic-Assisted Completion Cholecystectomy: A Safe and Effective Minimally Invasive Approach to a Challenging Surgical Scenario

Robotic-Assisted Completion Cholecystectomy: A Safe and Effective Minimally Invasive Approach to a Challenging Surgical Scenario

William B Lyman, MD, Michael Passeri, MD, David A Iannitti, MD, FACS, Dionisios Vrochides, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCSC, Erin H Baker, MD, FACS, John B Martinie, MD, FACS. Carolinas Medical Center

Background: Housed in a high volume tertiary referral center, our division receives a large amount of transfers and referrals from outside institutions for patients who require completion cholecystectomies.  In this study “completion cholecystectomy” refers to patients that meet one of three criteria:  1. previous subtotal cholecystectomy, 2. previously aborted cholecystectomy, or 3. previous cholecystectomy with incidental finding of cancer on pathology.  Traditionally, exploration of a reoperative field in the right-upper quadrant mandates an open approach due to dense adhesions and inflammation.  Over the past few years, we have found that robotic-assisted surgery has allowed us to perform these completion cholecystectomies in a minimally invasive fashion.   

Methods: Case logs and operating room billing logs were reviewed from 2010 to 2017 to identify all robotic-assisted cholecystectomies performed at our institution.  Review of all reports identified 30 completion cholecystectomies.  All additional variables including demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were determined from manual chart review of all consultation notes, operative reports, anesthesia records, progress notes, discharge summaries, and postoperative office visits.

Results: Of the 30 identified robotic-assisted completion cholecystectomies, 16 patients had a previous subtotal cholecystectomy, 11 patients had an aborted cholecystectomy, and 3 patients had an incidental finding of T2 gallbladder carcinoma on pathology. Fifteen patients (50%) underwent preoperative ERCP either for choledocolithiasis or to determine biliary anatomy.  Average time from original procedure was 44 months with 30.0% of previous procedures performed in an open approach.  Average OR time was 142.1 minutes, average EBL was 102.1cc, and average length of stay was 2.1 days.  One patient (3.3%) was readmitted within 30 days for nausea that resolved with antiemetics.  Three patients (10.0%) had minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2) which resolved with pharmacologic therapy. No patients suffered a 90-day mortality.  All cases were completed in minimally invasive fashion without a conversion to an open procedure.

Conclusions: Although rare, completion cholecystectomies present a challenging surgical scenario. Although traditionally performed in an open approach, we have had success in recent years at our institution with a robotic-assisted approach to completion cholecystectomy.  We feel that the robotic approach offers certain advantages in a hostile, reoperative field which allows us to perform these procedures in a minimally invasive fashion with no conversions to an open procedure to date. Previously limited to case reports, this report of 30 procedures represents the largest case series of robot-assisted completion cholecystectomies to our knowledge.  


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87850

Program Number: P080

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

70


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons