• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Predictors of Mortality after Elective Ventral Hernia Repair: An Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Predictors of Mortality after Elective Ventral Hernia Repair: An Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Zhamak Khorgami, MD, Benedict Y Hui, MD, Guido M Sclabas, MD. University of Oklahoma – Tulsa

Introduction: Ventral hernia (VH) is a common surgical problem and can present both as emergent and elective cases. Deciding between surgery and non-operative management of a non-obstructive VH in a high-risk patient can sometimes be a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate national series of open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR), and to assess factors associated with mortality after elective VHR.

Method: In a retrospective analysis of 2008-2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project – Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS), we included all patients with the main diagnosis of abdominal cavity hernia (except inguinal, femoral, and diaphragmatic), and a Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) code related to hernia procedures except inguinal and femoral. Elective and Laparoscopic VHR were identified. Factors associated with the same hospitalization mortality were analyzed using logistic regression multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 103,635 patients were studied (mean age 57.3±15.3 years, 61.4% female). There were 14,787 (14.3%) umbilical, 63,685 (61.5%) incisional, and 25,163 (24.3%) other ventral hernias. 215 (0.2%) patients had gangrenous hernia contents. Operative procedures included 59,993 (57.9%) elective and 43,642 (42.1%) emergent VHR.  21.3% elective VHR were laparoscopic versus 13% in emergent cases (P<0.001). Mesh was used in 52,642 (87.7%) elective VHR versus 27,734 (63.5%) emergent VHR (P<0.001). Mortality was 0.2% (n=135) in the elective and 0.6% (n=269) in emergent surgery group (P<0.001). In the elective surgery group, mortality rates were equal among laparoscopic and open VHR (0.2%), while in the emergent surgery group, laparoscopic VHR had a lower mortality rate (0.4% vs 0.6%, P=0.028). In the entire cohort, the median (interquartile range) of length of stay was 2 (3) days in the laparoscopic group and 3 (3) days in the open group (P<0.001), with no significant difference in total hospital charges. Multivariate analysis of elective VHR showed that the following factors were associated with mortality during hospitalization: male gender (Odds Ratio(OR)=2.37), age>50 years (OR=1.96), congestive heart failure (OR=2.15), pulmonary circulation disorders (OR=5.26), coagulopathy (OR=3.93), liver disease (OR=1.89), fluid and electrolyte disturbances (OR=8.66), metastatic cancer (OR=4.66), neurological disorders (OR=2.31), and paralysis (OR=5.29) (Table).

Conclusion: VHR has a low mortality rate, especially when performed laparoscopically. When planning for elective VHR, higher mortality is to be expected in older patients with comorbidities, especially patients with congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulation disorders, coagulopathy, chronic liver disease, metastatic cancer, neurological disorders, and paralysis. Conservative management should be more considered for these high-risk subgroups. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87602

Program Number: S013

Presentation Session: Outcomes/Quality Session

Presentation Type: Podium

160


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons