• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Mastery of General Surgery: An Impossible Task In The Army Healthcare System

Mastery of General Surgery: An Impossible Task In The Army Healthcare System

Timothy P Plackett, DO, MPH1, Joel R Brockmeyer, MD2, Danielle B Holt, MD3, Robert M Rush, Jr, MD4, Joy Sarkar, MD5, Steven A Satterly, MD1, Jason M Seery, MD6, Bradley R Zagol, MD7. 1Womack Army Medical Center, 2Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 3Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 4Madigan Army Medical Center, 5Brian Allgood Army Community Hospitl, 6Martin Army Community Hospital, 7Augusta University Medical Center

Objectives: The primary objective is to quantify the operative experience of Army general surgeons while not deployed and determine their capacity to obtain mastery in the operating room while working at military hospitals.  The secondary objective is to determine the effect of rank and individual hospitals on operative experience.

Methods: Average Surgeon Time reports were generated from the Surgical Scheduling System for all general surgery cases performed at seven Army medical treatment facilities (MTFs) during 2012-2016.  Cases performed by non-general surgeons were excluded.  Data was analyzed using the apriori definition of 10,000 hours of operative time equating with mastery.  This definition is based upon Ericsson’s Deliberate Practice Model and popularized by Malcolm Gladwell.  Groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA.

Results: 122 general surgeons operated at the 7 MTFs during the study period.  14 of the general surgeons were civilian employees and 6 surgeons were backfills with their primary MTF not participating in the study; these 20 surgeons were excluded from further analysis.  The average surgeon performed 108 ± 68 cases per year while in garrison.  The average surgeon spent 124 ± 86 hours operating annually while in garrison.  At this rate, it would take over 80 years to obtain mastery of surgery.  The ten highest volume surgeons averaged 218 cases per year and 291 hours of operating annual.  For the ten highest volume surgeons, it would take 34 years to obtain mastery of surgery.

When stratified based upon rank, Majors averaged 102 ± 51 cases and 114 ± 76 hours of surgery per year, Lieutenant Colonels averaged 137 ± 65 cases and 168 ± 100 hours of surgery per year, and Colonels averaged 107 ± 87 cases and 136 ± 101 hours of surgery per year.  Only the difference between Majors and Lieutenant Colonels was statistically significant (p<0.01).

When stratified based upon individual hospital there was significant variance in case volume and hours of surgery per year between the facilities (p<0.05).  At the highest performing hospital surgeons averaged 170 ± 83 cases and 187 ± 103 minutes of surgery per year.   At the lowest performing hospital surgeons averaged 71 ± 49 cases and 85 ± 56 minutes of surgery per year.

Conclusions: Obtaining mastery of general surgery is a nearly impossible proposition given the current care models at Army MTFs.  Alternative staffing and patient care models should be developed if Army surgeons are to be masters at their craft.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86443

Program Number: MSS20

Presentation Session: Full-Day Military Surgical Symposium – General Surgery Presentations

Presentation Type: MSSPodium

113


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons