• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Whipple Procedure with a 2-Layered Pancreatojejunostomy

Laparoscopic Whipple Procedure with a 2-Layered Pancreatojejunostomy

ANDREW A GUMBS, MD, BRICE GAYET, MD PhD, John P Hoffman, MD. FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER

INTRODUCTION
Since the first report of laparoscopic pancreatic resections in the early 1990’s, laparoscopic resection of tumors in the pancreas have become increasingly more common in the surgical treatment of both benign and malignant tumors1. The minimally invasive approach to lesions in the head of the pancreas, however, is still only being performed in highly specialized centers2. This is principally because of concerns for safely dissecting tumors off of the superior mesenteric /portal vein (SMV/PV) and SMA, the perceived difficulty in controlling major hemorrhage via the laparoscopic approach and concerns regarding the efficacy of a laparoscopically created pancreatic anastomosis.

METHOD
We employ the laparoscopic posterior approach first described by Prof. Brice Gayet3. The main differences of this approach include the early performance of an extended Kocher maneuver and transection of the uncinate process with the ultrasonic shears. As opposed to the previously reported video of this technique, this video highlights the laparoscopic formation of a 2-layered end-to-side pancreatojejunostomy. An internal stent consisting of a 5 Fr. pediatric feeding tube is used to prevent inadvertent closure of the pancreatic duct.

RESULTS
To date 5 laparoscopic Whipple procedures using the posterior approach have been performed in the United States. Two patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, one of which was given neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, one patient had a malignant neuroendocrine tumor, one patient had a malignant tumor arising from an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and a final patient had type I choledochocele involving her entire common bile duct. The average estimated blood loss was 450cc (range 200-800cc). The mean operative time was 485 minutes (range = 370-660 minutes). The length of stay averaged 11 days (range=7-14 days). One patient developed a bile leak, which responded to transhepatic biliary drainage and one patient developed a subhepatic abscess after removal of a gastrostomy tube that required percutaneous drainage on post-operative day #22. Average lymph node retrieval is 18 (range =16-29). All pancreatic margins were negative. However, one patient was found to have metastatic pancreatic cancer to the liver on final pathology in spite of a negative liver biopsy on frozen section analysis. This patient was found to have a hepatic recurrence at 12 months and is currently alive with 15 months of follow-up. All patients are currently alive with a mean follow-up of 11 months (range= 6-20 months), and the other 4 patients have no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive techniques for laparoscopic Whipple procedures are feasible and safe. The 2-layered end-to-side laparoscopic pancreatojejunostomy has a low rate of pancreatic fistula formation and may be ideal for laparoscopically created pancreatic anastomoses. Mastery of the anatomy and laparoscopic suturing is paramount before attempting this approach with minimally invasive techniques. It should currently only be performed by surgeons with expertise in both open and laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.


Session: SS03
Program Number: V014

1,192


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons