• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN SURGERY FOR PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: AN ENGLISH NATIONAL POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN SURGERY FOR PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: AN ENGLISH NATIONAL POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

Sheraz R Markar, Astrid Leusink, Tom Wiggins, Hugh Mackenzie, Omar Faiz, George B Hanna. Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Background: Previous randomized controlled trials have suggested a laparoscopic approach to the surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with a reduced length of hospital stay and postoperative pain. However there is limited evidence concerning the national impact of laparoscopic PPU surgery. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic approach to PPU surgery upon mortality and morbidity from a national English cohort.

Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of PPU, admitted as an emergency to a hospital in England, and receiving surgical intervention, between 2005 and 2012 were identified from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Outcomes analyzed included 30-day and 90-day mortality, 30-day complications and length of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify patient, hospital and treatment related factors associated with use of laparoscopy and mortality.

Results: Over the eight-year study period, 13,022 patients in England, underwent emergency surgery for PPU, this included 12,127 patients by open surgery and 895 patients by a laparoscopic approach.  From 2005 to 2012, utilization of laparoscopic surgery for PPU increased from 0% to 13%; P<0.001.

Univariate analysis

Laparoscopic surgery group had a reduced proportion of patient’s aged ≥70 years (25% vs. 37.8%; P<0.001), male sex (38% vs. 42.1%; P=0.016), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (7.8% vs. 12.5%; P<0.001), and cancer (0.1% vs. 0.8%; P=0.021). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with significant reductions in 30-day (7% vs. 15.7%; P<0.001) and 90-day mortality (8.9% vs. 19.6%; P<0.001), pneumonia (6% vs. 10.1%; P<0.001), ischemic cardiac events (1% vs. 2.4%; P=0.007), and length of hospital stay (median 5 vs. 7 days; P<0.001).

Multivariate analysis

High volume emergency center status was the only factor associated with an increased utilization of laparoscopic surgery (OR=1.37; 95%CI 1.15–1.64). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with significant reductions in 30-day (OR=0.49; 95%CI 0.37–0.65) and 90-day mortality (OR=0.49; 95%CI 0.38–0.63). Factors associated with increased 30-day and 90-day mortality in all patents and in those undergoing laparoscopic surgery included patient age ≥70 years, male sex and CCI ≥ 2.

Conclusion: The large national population-based cohort study, suggests improvements in mortality and morbidity from PPU associated with laparoscopic surgery. In more recent years there have been marked increases in the laparoscopic surgery for PPU mainly seen in high volume emergency centers, identifying heterogeneity in operative approach across England, and the need for improved training in the performance of emergency laparoscopic intervention.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 84810

Program Number: S067

Presentation Session: Acute Care Session

Presentation Type: Podium

49


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons