• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Nissen’s Fundoplication versus Laparoscopic Partial Fundoplication: Improvement in Reflux Scores without Mechanical Complications with Partial Fundoplica

Laparoscopic Nissen’s Fundoplication versus Laparoscopic Partial Fundoplication: Improvement in Reflux Scores without Mechanical Complications with Partial Fundoplica

Saurabh S Gandhi, MS, Ajay H Bhandarwar, MS, Chintan B Patel, MS, Amol N Wagh, MS, Priyank D Kothari, Eham L Arora. Grant Government Medical College

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is defined as chronic symptoms or mucosal damage caused by abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Chronic GERD is an established risk factor for development of barrets metaplasia. Surgical treatment includes dysphagia, bloating and flatulence(mechanical complications) which might require re-operation. Partial fundoplication has lesser incidence of above symtoms but has a potential for recurrent reflux and thus failure. Mechanical complications in Nissen's fundoplication are associated with a supracompetent high pressure zone (HPZ) which relaxes incompletely on swallowing and is associated with abolition of gas reflux and physiological acid reflux. Partial fundoplication procedures utilise a lesser degree of fundoplication, are associated with a very low incidence of mechanical complications. In the laparoscopic era mechanical complications have overtaken recurrent reflux as principal reason for revisional fundoplication. Our study aims to compare the above 2 procedures in terms of reflux, dysphagia, bloating and flatulence at 6 months from the procedure.

Materials and Methods: 260 patients between the years 2006 to 2016, matched for age, sex, gender ,weight and having reflux evidenced by manometry pressures<10 mm of mercury and 24 hr ph monitoring suggestive of reflux and a normal barium swallow underwent fundoplication. A floppy Nissen's fundoplication was used. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, one undergoing Nissen's and the other partial fundoplication. Post operatively patients were followed up at 1 year .Patients were compared in terms of improvement in reflux scores using baylors reflux symptom index(>13 suggestive of reflux), dysphagia scores, and presence of bloating or flatulence.

Results: 0ut of 130 patients 10 pts(7.7%) in the Nissen's group required reoperation for severe symtoms of dysphagia following which Nissen's fundoplication was taken down and converted into partial fundoplication. out of the remaining 120 patients 77%(92 patients) patients had complete resolution of reflux , 33 % patients(40) had significant dysphagia with 20 % patients(24) had flatulence and bloating.In the partial fundoplication group 85%(110) had improvement in reflux and remaining 15 % patients had persistent symptoms of reflux.The results were analysed statistically .

Conclusion: Partial fundoplication group had equivalent improvement in the symptoms of reflux as compared to Nissen's fundoplication without dysphagia and bloating associated with Nissen's fundoplication. Partial fundoplication procedure is at least as effective and durable in reflux control as Nissen's fundoplication, whilst being associated with lower incidence of mechanical complications.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 79999

Program Number: P623

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

267


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons