• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Is Prophylactic Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair on Contralateral Side Justified: A Comparative Study of Bilateral to Unilateral Repair in 1754 Hernias

Is Prophylactic Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair on Contralateral Side Justified: A Comparative Study of Bilateral to Unilateral Repair in 1754 Hernias

Objective- To study the outcome and morbidity parameters of total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair in patients with recurrent inguinal hernia and assess as how they are different from the primary inguinal hernia repair.

Patients & Methods- A retrospective analysis was carried out over a three-year period in 937 patients in whom TEP was done. The recurrence rate, pain scores at 24 hours, 1 week and 4 weeks, hospital stay, days to resume normal activities, seroma formation and urinary retention rates were noted. Pain scoring was done as -1=no pain, 2=mild pain, 3=moderate pain, 4=severe pain and 5=intolerable pain. The mean pain scores were calculated.

Results-In 937 patients, 52 patients underwent recurrent and 885 patients underwent primary hernia repair. Mean age was 48.4 ±14.5 yrs and 46.1±14.2 yrs in the recurrent and primary groups respectively (p=0.2, NS, t-test). Follow up range was 12-40 months (median- 25 months). The mean operating time was more in the recurrent group (32.7 ± 6.3 minutes) compared to the primary group (30.1 ± 6.1 minutes)(p=0.015, t-test). The mean pain scores at 24 hours were similar in both the groups (2.28±0.5-recurrent vs. 2.20 ± 0.4 – primary group, p=NS, t-test). However the pain scores at one week were significantly higher in the recurrent group (1.35 ±0.5) than the primary group (1.20 ±0.4) (p=0.017, t-test). The hospital stay and the days taken to resume normal activities were significantly longer in the recurrent than the primary group. (Hospital stay- 1.19 ±0.4 vs. 1.07 ±0.3 days, p= 0.002; Resume normal activities- 8.62 ± 2.6 vs. 7.67 ± 1.4 days, p


Session: Poster

Program Number: P453

View Poster

170


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons