• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / IMPACT OF DEVELOPING ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGY ON NATIONWIDE PRACTICE OF GENERAL SURGERY

IMPACT OF DEVELOPING ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGY ON NATIONWIDE PRACTICE OF GENERAL SURGERY

Eren Esen, MD, Erman Aytac, MD, Ilknur Erenler Bayraktar, MD, Bilgi Baca, MD, Ismail Hamzaoglu, MD, Tayfun Karahasanoglu, MD. Department of General Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine

Introduction: Robotic technique is the advanced and developing form of minimally invasive surgery. Limited data exist about course and current condition of robot use in general surgery. In this study, we aimed to assess adoption of evolving robots in the field of general surgery.

Methods: Robotic operations between January 2013 to July 2017 in Turkey were included. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Patient, surgeon and hospital identifiers were encrypted. Study parameters were operation type, operation year, robotic system used (S, Si, Xi), hospital volume and surgeon volume.

Results: 12151 robotic operations were performed in 32 hospitals in Turkey. The number of certified general surgeons on robotic surgery were 74. 1887 general surgery [Colorectal (42.3%), bariatrics (18.1%), retroperitoneal (11.2%), upper gastrointestinal (10.1%) hepatobiliary (8.7%), hernia (4.1%), others (5.4%)] procedures were performed. 56.5% and 43.5% of them were with S-Si and Xi platforms respectively. The median numbers of procedures were 33 (range 3-290) and 7 (range 1-276) cases per hospital and per general surgeon respectively. The high volume surgeons (higher than 75th percentile) performed 1462(77%) of the cases. The Xi platform has been the main tool for colorectal surgery only (Figure 1).       

Conclusions: While Xi platform significantly increased caseload in general surgery by facilitating performance of colorectal surgery, its preference in other general surgical fields is not superior to Si. Considering its visual superiority and financial benefits, sustaining Si seems feasible from institutional perspective if colorectal surgery is not one of the high-volume departments in a hospital.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87932

Program Number: P811

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

50


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons