• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Flexible Endoscopic Sub-rectal Sheath Tunneling Allowing Intraperitoneal Visualization During Single Incision Ventral Hernia Mesh Repair

Flexible Endoscopic Sub-rectal Sheath Tunneling Allowing Intraperitoneal Visualization During Single Incision Ventral Hernia Mesh Repair

Objective: Dual-layer mesh products are optimal for a subset of ventral hernia repair. While small umbilical defects are easily accessed through a single incision, intraperitoneal visualization is limited and only possible prior to mesh placement. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of a single-incision flexible endoscopic sub-rectal sheath tunneling technique to allow intraperitoneal visualization of mesh placement.

Methods and Procedures: Three 25-kg female swine were anesthetized with general anesthesia and intubated. A 2cm umbilical incision was created to mimic a standard approach for umbilical hernia repair. A dual-channel gastroscope (Storz) was introduced through this skin incision and an extraperitoneal tunnel below the rectus fascia was developed in two different locations. Needle knife cautery and endoscopic grasping forceps (Olympus) were used for dissection and to enter the peritoneal cavity. The scope was retroflexed allowing intraperitoneal visualization of the hernia site. Mesh repair was performed in usual fashion using 2-0 prolene sutures and intraperitoneal visualization confirmed mesh deployment without incident. The scope was removed and single incision closed in usual fashion.

Results: The total duration of the procedure was approximately 30minutes ± 10minutes. The average length of the tunnel was 15cm. A lateral approach was abandoned after the first procedure because of fear of bowel injury during peritoneal entry. The two following techniques employed a tunnel that entered the abdomen over the liver. Intraperitoneal visualization was performed without associated bowel injury by three surgeons of varying endoscopic experience.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of a technique that does not require further skin incisions or fascial disruption yet allows intraperitoneal visualization of mesh placed during a single incision hernia repair. Further studies will employ semi-rigid over-tubes to facilitate angulation and larger pieces of mesh employing more complicated peritoneal fixation.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P466

View Poster

178


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons