• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Feasibility of concurrent laparoscopic liver resection and stoma closure

Feasibility of concurrent laparoscopic liver resection and stoma closure

Yosuke Ueno, MD, Masayasu Aikawa, MD, Kenichiro Takase, MD, Katsuya Okada, MD, Kojun Okamoto, MD, Hiroshi Sato, MD, Shinichi Sakuramoto, MD, Shigeki Yamaguchi, MD, Yukihiro Watanabe, MD, Isaum Koyama, MD. Saitama Medical University, International Medical Center

Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is increasingly performed and its feasibility has been established in a variety of situations. However, LLR for patients with a history of abdominal surgery is often avoided because of difficulty placing trocars.The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of concurrent laparoscopic liver resection and stoma closure (SC) in comparison with an open approach.

Method: Between April 2008 and September 2017, 4 patients who underwent concurrent LLR and SC (LLR group) were compared with 6 patients who underwent concurrent open liver resection and SC (OLR group). Patient background, characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared. In the LLR group, the first port was placed with an Alexis® wound retractor (Applied Medical, USA) and Free Access® (TOP Corporation, Japan) at the abdominal defect made by previous SC. An additional 2 or 3 trocars were placed as needed.

Results: All patients in the LLR group were treated using the laparoscopic approach. There were no other significant differences in patient background and characteristics.Operative duration was similar for these groups. Blood loss, complication rate, and hospital stay in the LLR group were significantly decreased compared with the OLR group.Conclusion: In concurrent liver resection and SC, the open approach may require multiple large incisions, but the laparoscopic approach can complete procedures with a stoma wound and a few port wounds. Additionally, use of a platform on the wound for SC enhances safety and efficacy for dissection of intraabdominal adhesions and a clear operative view.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86953

Program Number: P517

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

53


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons