• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Feasibility and functional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer: comparative study with conventional laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Feasibility and functional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer: comparative study with conventional laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Young Kyu Park, PhD, Mi Ran Jung, PhD, Seong Yeob Ryu, PhD, Oh Jeong, PhD. Chonnam National university Hwasun Hospital

Introduction: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with double tract reconstruction (DTR) is an attractive treatment option for proximal gastric cancer when considering the advantages of a function preservation, including improved nutrition and a decreased incidence of postopertive reflux esophagitis. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of LPG with DTR and to compare the functional outcomes of LPG with laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG).

Methods: Between November 2011 and August 2015, 158 patients with proximal gastric cancer underwent LPG (n=24) or LTG (n=134) at our institution. Patients were indicated for LPG if they were diagnosed with cT1N0M0 and LTG was indicated for the patients with cT1N0, T1N1 and T2N0 gastric cancer. We reviewed their medical records from our prospectively collected gastric cancer database. The clinicopathological characteristics and functional outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results: There was no significant differences in demographic and pathologic characteristics. Though the operative time was longer in LPG group (303±54 vs. 262±78 min, p=0.013), the postoperative 30-days complication rate was not significantly different between two groups (20.8% vs. 16.4%, p=0.565). The incidences of endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis (0% vs. 3.7%, p=1.000) and reflux symptoms (4.8% vs. 10.9%, p=0.694) were similar in both groups. LPG group had a significantly better serum Vitamine B12 levels at the first postoperative year than LTG group(420±289 vs. 253±133, p=0.028). The body weight loss during postoperative 1 year was also significantly lower in LPG group (6.4±3.3 vs. 8.7±4.5 kg, p=0.023).

Conclusion: In the study, the LPG with DTR is a technically feasible and showed comparable incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis to the LTG. Moreover, LPG is preferred over LTG in terms of postoperative nutritional status at first year. Therefore, LPG with DTR would be a good alternative procedure for proximal gastric cancer. A large scaled randomized trial is needed to validate the functional benefits of LPG.

124


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons