• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Examining the role of Preoperative Ineffective Esophageal Motility in Laparoscopic Fundoplication Outcomes

Examining the role of Preoperative Ineffective Esophageal Motility in Laparoscopic Fundoplication Outcomes

Tyler Hall, Natalie Warnes, Kristine Kuchta, Herbert Hedberg, MD, John G Linn, MD, Stephen P Haggerty, MD, Woody Denham, MD, Michael Ujiki, MD. NorthShore University HealthSystem

Introduction: Patients suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may elect to undergo antireflux surgery (ARS). Our aim was to compare postoperative quality of life outcomes between patients who did and did not exhibit ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) before undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication.

Methods and Procedures: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwe?nt laparoscopic fundoplication between 2009 – 2016. All cases were performed by one of four surgeons at a single institution. Laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet, and Dor fundoplications were studied.

All patients underwent preoperative manometry. Cohorts were defined according to % ineffective clearance reported in manometry results; the first cohort is considered ‘normal’, with less than30% ineffective clearance. The second, third and fourth cohorts exhibited IEM with ≥30%, ≥50%, and 100% ineffective clearance respectively. Quality of life outcomes were measured using Short Form-36 (SF-36), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), Dysphagia scores, and Reflux Severity Index (RSI) surveys administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Comparisons between cohorts were made using Fisher’s Exact and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests.

Results: A cohort of 282 patients underwent ARS between 2009 – 2016 and agreed to participate in the study. Demographic variables including gender, BMI, and smoking status were similar between all cohorts.  Patients with 30%, 50%, and 100% ineffective clearance were more likely to receive a Toupet vs a Nissen fundoplication (Table 1). A higher percentage of patients with effective clearance underwent concurrent hiatal hernia repair, and the distribution of hernia type varied between cohorts (Table 2). There were no significant differences in complications or recurrence rates. Preoperative quality of life measures did not vary between the cohorts nor did postoperative scores at three weeks or six months. Patients with 100% ineffective clearance exhibited worse GERD-HRQL scores one and two years postoperatively (1 year – effective: 5.6, 100% ineffective: 8.5 p = 0.045, 2 years – effective: 7.4, 100% ineffective: 11.0 p = 0.046). Likewise, patients with 30% ineffective clearance showed worse GERD-HRQL scores at one year (effective: 5.6, >30% ineffective: 9.5 p = 0.036).

Conclusion: Preoperative ineffective esophageal motility was shown to result in comparable short-term quality of life following ARS. However, GERD-HRQL scores at one and two yearsshowed worse outcomes in patients with preoperative IEM. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88090

Program Number: P739

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

342


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons