• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Evolving National Practice Patterns for Management of Paraesophageal Hernia: A Population Based Study

Evolving National Practice Patterns for Management of Paraesophageal Hernia: A Population Based Study

EVOLVING NATIONAL PRACTICE PATTERNS FOR MANAGEMENT OF PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIA: A POPULATION BASED STUDY
Thai H. Pham MD, Kyle A. Perry MD, Eugene Y. Chang MD, Brian S. Diggs PhD, John G Hunter MD, Brett C Sheppard MD. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Introduction: Based on studies from specialized centers, laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair has proven to be a safe and effective procedure. We hypothesized that during the past decade, both the total number of PEH repairs and the proportion approached laparoscopically have increased. The aim of this population based study was to examine the evolution of national practice patterns for the management of PEH.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 1996-2006 using ICD-9 diagnosis codes for PEH and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Based on procedure codes, PEH repairs were categorized as laparoscopic, transthoracic, or open abdominal. National estimates of inpatient mortality, morbidity, and patient characteristics were computed.
Results: An estimated 97,757 PEH repairs were performed during the study period. The number of PEH repairs performed annually increased from 6,957 cases in 1996 to 9,366 in 2001 and then to 10,409 cases in 2006. Overall, 76.7% were performed via laparotomy, 13.5% transthoracic and 9.8% laparoscopically. During the study period, laparoscopic repairs have decreased as outlined in the table below. Laparoscopic repair was associated with significantly improved mortality (0.93%, p=0.004) and morbidity (7.63%, p=0.0001) compared to transthoracic (1.37% and 12.8%) and laparotomy (1.32% and 9.77%).
Conclusion: As expected, this population based analysis demonstrates a steady increase in the total number of PEH repairs performed annually in the United States. Despite its lower morbidity and mortality, laparoscopic PEH repair has yet to gain national acceptance.
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Open Abd. 71.9% 72.9% 73.7% 75.0% 77.3% 85.4%
TT 13.2% 13.4% 15.2% 14.7% 12.4% 11.0%
Lap 14.9% 13.6% 11.0% 10.3% 10.3% 3.6%
TT=Transthoracic; Lap=Laparoscopic


Session: Poster

Program Number: P348

View Poster

71


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons