• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / ENDOSCOPIC LUMINAL STENTS FOR TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING BARIATRIC SURGERY

ENDOSCOPIC LUMINAL STENTS FOR TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING BARIATRIC SURGERY

Aimal Khan, MD, Jason Howard, MD, Alfred Trang, MD, Renee Tholey, MD, Ramsey M Dallal, MD. Einstein Healthcare Network

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic stents have been used to treat bariatric surgery complications; however, data is lacking in the indications and efficacy.

METHODS: A single institutional retrospective observational trial spanning 10 years of all bariatric surgery complications managed with endoscopic stents.

RESULTS: 15 patients underwent 21 fully covered stent placement procedures. Indications for stent placement were leak in 8 patients (1 sleeve; 7 bypass) and stricture in 7 patients (4 bypass, 3 sleeve). Five patients had stent migration. Three required surgical removal, one patient endoscopic repositioning and one passed the stent per rectum. All eight patients with enteric leak successfully underwent stent placement in conjunction with diagnostic laparoscopy and drainage. All but one of these patients developed an enteric leak perioperative to index procedure. The average duration of stent treatment in these patients was 21 days (14-47 days). Of the 7 patients treated for a stricture, 3 patients (2 sleeve, 1 bypass) failed treatment and required subsequent definitive operative revision. Average length of time of stent treatment in these patients was 3 days (range, 1-14 days) and five had severe intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stent placement of leak may require multiple procedures and carries the risk of migration; however, this therapy seems to be an effective treatment. Failure rates are higher with strictures and are not as tolerated by patients. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87467

Program Number: P384

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

131


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons