• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE FOLLOWING BARIATRIC SURGERY

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE FOLLOWING BARIATRIC SURGERY

Margaret E Smith, MD, Aaron Bonham, MSc, Amir Ghaferi, MD, MS. University of Michigan

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative readmissions following bariatric surgery have declined over recent years; however, a concurrent reduction in postoperative emergency department (ED) visits has not occurred. The most common reasons for ED encounters include abdominal pain, dehydration and nausea. A large proportion of these visits may be appropriately addressed in lower acuity centers (urgent care center, infusion center, etc). Given the substantial cost associated with unnecessary utilization of healthcare resources, we sought to determine the economic impact of shifting potentially avoidable ED visits to lower acuity centers.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Using data from a large statewide quality improvement collaborative, we identified patients undergoing primary, non-revisional bariatric surgery from January 2012 – June 2015 (n=20,057). Information regarding 30-day postoperative ED use, chief complaint at presentation, and 30-day readmission was obtained. “Potentially avoidable ED visits” were defined as 30-day postoperative ED visits not resulting in an admission. To assess the economic impact, we evaluated price-standardized payments for ED visits which were available in a subset of our population (n=5,499). Average Urgent Care Center episode cost was then calculated from a private insurer’s claims data for all post-bariatric surgery Urgent Care visits in 2015.

RESULTS: In our full cohort of 20,057 patients, the 30-day postoperative ED visit rate was 8.2% (n=1,638). The 30-day readmission rate was 4.1% (n=812). The average ED episode cost in patients who were not readmitted (i.e., “potentially avoidable ED visits”) was $1,310. The average cost of an Urgent Care Center visit was $126. Triaging a potentially avoidable ED visit to an Urgent Care Center would generate a savings of $1,184 per patient. In just the subset of 2014 patients with claims data, shifting the potentially avoidable ED visits to an Urgent Care setting would result in a net savings of $178,363, with much higher potential savings ($977,984) when extrapolated to the entire cohort. (Figure)

CONCLUSION(S): In a large statewide collaborative, as many as 50% of 30-day postoperative ED visits after bariatric surgery are potentially avoidable. If all of these visits were shifted to lower cost settings, it would result in an annual savings of $279,424 in this single state cohort. If extrapolated to the entire United States the net savings would be $7.4 million per year.  Triaging of patients to lower acuity centers may serve as a template for decreasing excessive ED utilization and thus containing costs among post-operative bariatric patients.  


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 88121

Program Number: S010

Presentation Session: Outcomes/Quality Session

Presentation Type: Podium

48


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons