• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / DUODENAL STENTING IS CLINICALLY EFFECTIVE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF FISTULOUS OUTPUT AFTER COMPLEX PANCREATICODUODENAL TRAUMA: A MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY

DUODENAL STENTING IS CLINICALLY EFFECTIVE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF FISTULOUS OUTPUT AFTER COMPLEX PANCREATICODUODENAL TRAUMA: A MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY

Hassan Mashbari, MD, Kevin L Chow, MD, Mohannad Hemdi, MD, Kirstie K Danielson, PhD, Eduardo Smith-Singares, MD. University of Illinois at Chicago

Introduction: Complex pancreatic and duodenal injuries due to trauma continue to present a formidable challenge to the trauma surgeon with a described mortality of 5-30% and morbidity of 22-27%. Duodenal fistula formation subsequent to failure of attempted primary repair is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We present the first reported series of four patients with complex trauma-related duodenal injuries who had failure of primary repair which were managed with duodenal stenting. We compared outcomes to a matched case control cohort of patients with trauma related duodenal injuries. The aim of this study is to document our experience with enteral stents in patients with complex duodenopancreatic traumatic injuries.

Methods: A retrospective review at a Level I trauma center identified 4 patients who underwent endoscopically placed indwelling covered metal stents after failure of primary duodenal repair in the form of high output duodenal fistulas. A matched case control cohort was identified including 6 patients with duodenal fistulas who were not treated with stents. Drainage volumes were collected and classified according to source and phase of intervention (i.e. admission to fistula diagnosis, to stent insertion, after removal, and until discharge).

Results: There was a decrease in the mean combined drain output of 497ml/day (p=0.16) after stent placement.  When comparing the sum of all output sources, there was a statistically significant difference across phases (p=0.03) and “After Removal” was significantly less when compared to the reference phase (p=0.05). There was also a change in the directionality of the slope for the sum of all drain outputs with an increase of 13 ml/day2 prior to stent placement compared to a decrease of 13ml/day2 (p=0.26) after stent placement. The stenting group demonstrated a decrease in mean drain output (1063ml/day vs 1446ml/day, p=0.24) and increase in distal gastrointestinal output (700ml/day vs 223ml/day, p=0.16). One patient in the stent group required later operative repair. All other patients in the stenting and control group had resolution of their fistulas over time. There were 2 late mortalities in the control group.

Conclusion: The stent treated patients demonstrated diversion of approximately 500ml/day of enteral contents distally. While all patients eventually healed their fistulas, the stent treated patients demonstrated an accelerated abatement of drain outputs when compared to the control cohort, but did not reach statistical significance. Indwelling enteral-coated stents appear to be an effective rescue method for an otherwise inaccessible duodenal fistula after failure of primary repair.

Patient Characteristics

Combined output data

Case Controlled Data


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87858

Program Number: P373

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

98


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons