• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search the SAGES Site
    • Guidelines Search
    • Video Search
    • Search Images
    • Search Abstracts
  • OWLS/FLS
  • Login
You are here: Home / Abstracts / DOES TIME TO CLOSURE OF LOOP ILEOSTOMY INCREASE THE RISK OF POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS? A LARGE, SINGLE-INSTITUTION REVIEW

DOES TIME TO CLOSURE OF LOOP ILEOSTOMY INCREASE THE RISK OF POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS? A LARGE, SINGLE-INSTITUTION REVIEW

Richard Garfinkle, MD, Gregory Sigler, Nancy Morin, MD, Gabriela Ghitulescu, MD, Sahir Bhatnagar, PhD, Julio Faria, MD, Philip Gordon, MD, Carol-Ann Vasilevsky, MD, Marylise Boutros, MD. Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital

INTRODUCTION: It has been hypothesized that the structural and functional changes that develop in the defunctioned segment of bowel may contribute to the development of postoperative ileus (POI) after loop ileostomy closure (LIC). As such, longer intersurgery interval between ileostomy creation and LIC may increase POI.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: After institutional review board approval, all patients who underwent LIC at a single institution between 2007-2017 were identified. The primary endpoint, primary POI, was defined as either a) being kept nil-per-os on or after postoperative day 3 for symptoms of nausea / vomiting, distension, and/or obstipation or b) having a nasogastric tube (NGT) inserted, without postoperative obstruction or sepsis. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay (LOS) and non-POI related morbidity. Patients who left the operating room with a NGT, had a planned laparotomy with a concomitant procedure at the time of LIC, had a total proctocolectomy as their index operation, or had secondary POI, were excluded. Patients were then divided into two groups based on timing from the index operation to LIC (<6 months vs. >6 months).

RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine patients underwent LIC – 92 within 6 months of ileostomy creation, and 167 after 6 months. The median age was 65.2 (56.0-73.0) years and 58.7% were male. Patients with >6 months intersurgery interval were more likely to have a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (89.8% vs. 77.2%, p=0.010), to have had an open index colorectal resection (88.6% vs. 76.1%, p=0.040), and to have suffered an anastomotic leak after the index resection (15.0% vs. 4.3%, p=0.012). POI was observed in 18.9% of patients, while overall 30-day postoperative and non-POI related morbidity were 39.5% and 23.6%, respectively. POI was more frequently observed in patients with >6 months intersurgery interval (22.8% vs. 12.0%, p=0.046). Completion of adjuvant chemotherapy prior to LIC was the only other predictor of POI on univariate analysis (51.0% vs. 34.9%, p=0.049). In all patients, POI resulted in a greater median LOS (9 (8-16.5) vs. 5 (4-6) days, p<0.001) but was not associated with an increase in non-POI related morbidity (27.3% vs. 22.4%, p=0.55). On multivariable regression, intersurgery interval >6 months remained a significant predictor of POI (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.21-5.91).

CONCLUSION(S): Intersurgery interval >6 months is an independent predictor of primary POI after LIC. Such patients may benefit from preoperative bowel stimulation; a novel intervention being evaluated to decrease POI after LIC.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87958

Program Number: P206

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

286


  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons